Forum Moderators: martinibuster
If you put more than 3, let's say 5, the other 2 ads will not display in Firefox or regular IE which is fine. However, if you're using MSN IE in Windows XP, your entire page will not display and you'll get this error message:
We can't find "http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pag..."
Error - Invalid syntax
I'm not sure how many people use MSN IE, but this browser seems popular in the United State and is roughly used by about 10% of US users. This means you will lose about 10% income and page views per day (from US visitors).
Just my 2 cents.
n.b. I hope Google tech fix this problem. But we can't really ask our users to stop using MSN.
[edited by: jbayabas at 3:20 am (utc) on Feb. 7, 2008]
This issue should be of absolutely no concern to anyone playing by the rules.
By the way, I think the title of this thread is deceptive.
[edited by: MyNewPC at 3:21 am (utc) on Feb. 7, 2008]
I don't think you understand what I'm trying to say. This is not in Violation of Adsense TO. Some users may NOT be aware they are displaying more than 3 image/text ads depending on how their site are coded. Example, if you are using Blogspot and place the adsense code in one part of the php, the adsense code will duplicate in some pages. So if you already have an image/text code in the header, footer, body, this additional duplicate will result in 4 codes in total sometimes even 5.
AS has a script that if you "accidentally" or "unintentionally" place more than 3 text/image ads in a single page, the additional ads in question will not display. This script works successfully in Firefox and IE. But not in MSN IE in Windows XP.
I don't think you understand what I'm trying to say. This is not in Violation of Adsense TO. Some users may NOT be aware they are displaying more than 3 image/text ads depending on how their site are coded.
Pleading stupidity doesn't shield you from the consequences of violating TOS, or the law.
AS has a script that if you "accidentally" or "unintentionally" place more than 3 text/image ads in a single page, the additional ads in question will not display.
I'm impressed. This is the first hard evidence that google scripts can actually figure out your intent, and stupidity levels, so if its accidental, it will understand, but if it's intentional, whammo.
Pretty cool. I wonder how, though...
I'd test it myself except that I only use (a maximum of) one ad block per page, and I just can't summon up the energy to be too concerned about what happens if you show 4+ blocks.
Anyone else is welcome to replicate the experiment, but in any case it appears that the bug is not universal.
Browsing a test page with 5 ads has exactly the same result as using IE6 - ads 1, 2 and 3 appear, while ads 4 and 5 are blank.
Since I downloaded this from msn.com, I'll assume I got the latest version (7.02.0011.2700). I even rebooted to make sure it took full effect.
So my guess is that the OP either:
Has an old version of MSN browser;
There's a problem with the installation;
Has changed the default settings;
Has some other problem on the page (besides too many ads);
Or it could be something else. However it appears that by default, the current version of MSN browser does not crash when there are too many ads on the page.
jbayabas, if you would like to sticky me the link that crashed on you, I'll check it out with my freshly installed MSN browser.
If you put more than 3, let's say 5, the other 2 ads will not display in Firefox or regular IE which is fine.
I just came across a site that is displaying 4 ad units (and 1 link unit). Windows XP Pro and IE6.
I've also seen a celebrity blog with about 10 search units on a page. The max allowed is two.
It's kind of like the difference between Budweiser and Michelob. Both are made by the same company, and both taste about the same. But Michelob is supposedly fancier than Budweiser.
An interesting analogy, tim, but not exactly correct. Bud and Michelob are brewed separately. They're not the same beer with different labels.
However, I'm pretty sure MSN IE is just re-branded IE, it is the same code (if anything, perhaps older versions of the same code, but the same code nonetheless).
So, while I don't disbelieve the original report, I'd venture to guess something other than the fact that it's MSN IE causing the problem (like a plug-in one browser has that the other one doesn't, etc...)
on a set.
Motivation helps above all.