Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Worst ad format for me is image ads (any size). I've tried it a few times but the results were horrible. Also noticed MFAs and other useless sites love to use image ads. Google also has a very hard time filtering out irrelevant image ads (which also explains why CTR crashes).
p/g
468 x 60 banners were the first main type of gif banner ads back in the 90s. Back then most people had a 800x600 screen (or smaller). Now monitors are bigger and 468 x 60 doesn't look so good. I don't know anyone who's doing really well with 468x60.
The 468 x 60 format actually performs pretty well for me on the sites where I use it.
To truly compare between ad performance we should look at ad formats displaying the same number of ads. Like 468x60 vs 120x240 for example.
I agree an apples to apples comparison is best. However, I've found that on my sites, 120 x 240 is just as likely to show 1 ad as 2. Same with the square and rectangles - sometimes they show 1, sometimes 2 and sometimes 4.
FarmBoy