Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Here's the article: [imediaconnection.com...]
Further,
Google states that sites that display its ads should not display ”violent content”. I have provided two examples of gun blogs that clearly violate this.
If this man's decision making process leads him to conclude that a blog where gun bloggers discuss guns constitutes violent content, I personally don't put much credibility in his other decisions.
FarmBoy
Do some people feel that every company should have total transparency about their inner workings, algos et al?
A company certainly wouldn't last very long if it divulged all its trade-developed "secrets".
Matt
Despite what Google might tell you, its targeting efficiency is not all that great. Since we have no reliable way to test this at a network level, here are a few examples. I found an ad for a JCPenney ”Back to School Sale” on a blog about Taiwan. JCPenney has stores in the U.S. and Puerto Rico only.
Well, duh. The ads are geotargeted.
If you're going to be issuing a report, know your topic, first. Author Sandeep Krishnamurthy, for demonstrating stunning lack of knowledge on the subject and not letting that deficit get in the way of your opinion: F.
It's incredible that someone with his impressive academic background could get so much wrong. Dramatically highlights the difference between received knowledge and knowledge based on experience.
[edited by: martinibuster at 6:56 pm (utc) on Sep. 15, 2007]
Don not use blog in the url path; do not use blog in your blog title; do not use the word blogroll; do not use the word blog anywhere on your blog; credit anybody who needs to be on a single credits page and not in the footer, etc.