Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Server-side AdSense?

My dream...

         

mikomido

10:16 pm on Jul 27, 2007 (gmt 0)



Why doesn't Google give the ability to tech-savvy long-time (but non-premium) AS customers to do AdSense serving server-side? This would eliminate JavaScript (obviously) and most adblocking. You know... just like Google does for their own SERPS.

Isn't this a good idea? Or are they scared people would somehow modify the output? I really don't see why they don't allow this. It would be much better for me and most of you, I assume.

greatstart

1:10 am on Jul 28, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It's a great idea, but I can't imagine them ever implementing this feature. Just too many security issues involved.

HuskyPup

2:27 pm on Jul 28, 2007 (gmt 0)



to do AdSense serving server-side?

What you actually proposing?

Am I missing something since I already use server side includes for AdSense?

Or are they scared people would somehow modify the output?

They can do that now if they're so inclined.

I don't believe I understand precisely what you are suggesting. Please explain.

Metaphorically

4:27 pm on Jul 28, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Nah, Google gets too much visitor info about your site and site visitors that they couldn't get if it were server side. They'd never do it (not that I wouldn't jump on it in a heartbeat if I could use it server-side).

mikomido

4:32 pm on Jul 28, 2007 (gmt 0)



HuskyPup: AdSense is served with JavaScript client-side. I mean that they should give us API access to do it on the server (our server) side.

europeforvisitors

4:55 pm on Jul 28, 2007 (gmt 0)



What's in it for them?

mikomido

5:07 pm on Jul 28, 2007 (gmt 0)



europeforvisitors: "What's in it for me? I really gotta know. What's in it for me? This ain't no one-man show!"

Seriously... they'd get less people blocking their ads, thus more impressions, thus more coins for their money bin?

davec

3:22 pm on Jul 29, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



they'd get less people blocking their ads, thus more impressions, thus more coins for their money bin?

I would have thought that any increase in ads shown due to not being blocked would be more than countered by people gaming the system. Can't see them entertaining this for the vast majority of adsense partners.

[edit - should really have said people 'trying' to game the system]

incrediBILL

10:49 am on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Why doesn't Google give the ability to tech-savvy long-time (but non-premium) AS customers to do AdSense serving server-side?

Fear of tech support costs.

They made AdSense so stupid even stupid people could use it and based on all the questions I read around the 'net, that wasn't quite good enough as some can't even install AdSense.

Heck, I'm pushing 3M+ pages a month now and can't even get the server side code!

When you make enough money that it's worth the tech support hassle they'll let you know.

HEY ASA! For Xmas this year, tell 'em to shove the Google gift and give us server side code, that's what *I* want for Xmas is server side AdSense, ho ho ho, deck the halls and all that.

FourDegreez

1:03 pm on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I too would use server-side AdSense. I've been waiting for that feature for some time now. I mentioned it over a year ago, and some people said it's like giving Google the keys to your car. I don't understand this objection. What are they going to do, hack my site? lol. If you have that lack of trust, you shouldn't be running AdSense at all (not to mention Analytics).

europeforvisitors

3:01 pm on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)



they'd get less people blocking their ads, thus more impressions, thus more coins for their money bin?

I don't see that as a great benefit for Google. Any user who blocks ads isn't likely to click on ads. (Also, if ad blocking were having a significant impact on revenues, Google obviously would be taking measures to address it.)

mikomido

4:21 pm on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)



FourDegreez: Whoever said that is clueless about just about everything related to computers and the Web.

"Any user who blocks ads isn't likely to click on ads."

LOTS of people block them without knowing so. They didn't do that themselves.

incrediBILL

4:22 pm on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



LOTS of people block them without knowing so. They didn't do that themselves.

Exactly.

Install Norton A/V with the Norton Firewall enabled and TA DA! all the ads go poof.

My mom had no clue what she wasn't seeing online.

europeforvisitors

4:28 pm on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)



Sorry to hear about your mom's inability to see ads, but Google doesn't appear to view ad blocking as a major problem, and AdSense revenues have been growing steadily.

jatar_k

4:28 pm on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member



I don't see this ever being an option, it removes G's control over presentation.

An API will give too much access to ad inventory and open the door to (more) abuse.

incrediBILL

4:44 pm on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Sorry to hear about your mom's inability to see ads, but Google doesn't appear to view ad blocking as a major problem, and AdSense revenues have been growing steadily

I can tell from my site stats that it's definitely a problem for my traffic. My direct advertisers are obviously embedded into the page server side, not included with javascript, and they get more impressions than AdSense shows in the same day and that's after filtering out bot traffic.

It's a combination of people that either simply have javascript disabled or run a firewall that blocks ad servers.

Is the problem so severe that it makes AdSense ineffective?

Obviously not yet, but full scale AdSense blocking could happen if people get sick of the ads just like popup blocking is pretty standard these days.

incrediBILL

4:46 pm on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I don't see this ever being an option, it removes G's control over presentation.

The only presentation G will ultimately care about is to their shareholders.

If ad blocking software puts a big dent in their bottom line you'll see a lot more publishers getting premium services to fix the problem.

jatar_k

5:00 pm on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member



absolutely but, up to now, they have been so paranoid about changing code that I doubt this option has a place yet.

amznVibe

5:03 pm on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



There are a handful of premium sites that have adsense server side for years.

But server side can be blocked too if any element has an id or name.

mikomido

5:10 pm on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)



Quite frankly, I'm surprised that serious, commerical packages such as Norton behave like this (blocking ads). It sounds really insane to be honest.

mikomido

5:12 pm on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)



"But server side can be blocked too if any element has an id or name."

Obviously. But how likely is that? It would either have to guess (CSS: "div#ads, div#left_ads { display: none; }") or do it manually. VERY different.

europeforvisitors

6:55 pm on Jul 30, 2007 (gmt 0)



Obviously not yet, but full scale AdSense blocking could happen if people get sick of the ads just like popup blocking is pretty standard these days.

There's a big difference between AdSense ads and popups: Popups clutter up your screen, forcing you to close them manually. AdSense ads are just passive, and if you block them, you don't really gain anything (as you do when you block popups).

In any case, if and when Google perceives a problem, it obviously will deal with the issue. Google wants to earn money just as much as we do!