Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Bypassing Adsense

         

kidder

9:26 am on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The logical way to avoid problems with your adsense account would be to bypass google and go direct to the clients. Why don't more people simply follow this path if they have quality sites? I undertstand google has the clients but in theory it would not take long to build a short list of advertisers? I raise this point because adsense seems to have a unique position in the business world - total non disclosure? Publishers or advertising partners go in blind on a "maybe" - Try explaining this to people in mainstream business and they think it's insane, throw in "smart pricing" and people are even more stunned. I am sure we are going to look back on this period of internet history and wonder - or cry. My own solution will be to look at running inhouse advertising in a priority system over adsense but I need to check that with their TOS. The one big fear I have is losing my organic rankings/trust if I reduce my adsense exposure.

sailorjwd

9:55 am on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The reason people don't do what you suggest is that it can be a full time job to get and maintain advertisers. Many folks using adsense are not computer experts and have a 'real job' to do.

Many (most) of the computer experts doing adsense are running MFA sites or arbitrage.

I like having a reasonable income from adsense and yet have 16 hours a day to do my real job.

jetteroheller

10:10 am on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



It's simple because Google can pay more.

Google can use the ad space far better.

For example I visit a fair and make a photo from a company working only regional.

The page with the photo is good ranked for a general search term around the widget on the photo.

There are about 92 Million people speaking German, but only maybe 2 million in the range where this company works.

So when he would pay me personal for an ad on this page, only 1 of 46 visitors would be in the range of his company.

He has nothing from a visitor several hundred kms away.

But AdWords has the geographic targeted options. An AdWords client can target "search term" and 50km distance around his location.

vincevincevince

10:27 am on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Think of it the other way around. You ask someone who is happily advertising on your site via Adsense's content network to consider a direct deal. They look at your site and promptly blacklist it from their Adwords account on the basis that you're not the great match they thought they were getting with Adsense...

kidder

11:07 am on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member




Sure but if your site is a great match you might offer a nice discount to the advertiser and still come out way in front.. Adsense is fine it's the non disclosure that should be illegal.

vincevincevince

11:36 am on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



So far as I know, the non disclosure doesn't extend past the length of the contract and so if you end your contract with Google then you can do what you like with former advertisers.

fearlessrick

12:55 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



It's the end of the quarter and Google is surely taking 70% or more from most ads right now. My own tracking shows an increase in revenue for the last 10 days of June over the rest of the month in 2005 and 2006, but this year, as Google eliminated some MFAs and arbs, they need the spare $$$ still remaining and are raping the publishers AGAIN. My eanings are down over 50% from previous years. Yesterday (June 25) was the lowest eCPM in over 2 years. I made more money with CPM ads on the same pages AND THEY WERE ONLY FILLING 20-30% OF AVAILABLE INVENTORY.

Nothing but a bunch of thieves, these Googlers.

celgins

1:09 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



They look at your site and promptly blacklist it from their Adwords account on the basis that you're not the great match they thought they were getting with Adsense.

This may start happening regardless. Especially now that some advertisers can see which sites they're ads are displayed on, and even more so when site-targeted contextual ads begin.

sonny

1:10 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I was thinking of that. $3/page/month would break even for me and they could be an exclusive advertiser.

Trying to manage that would be work, though.

fearlessrick

1:21 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Ha, ha, on average, $3/page per YEAR would bring in more than Google pays.

Genuine1

1:43 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My ecpm has been over 20.00 from the start in 2003 and after june is over 30.00. Today is 35+

Google obviously isnt robbing me, or you! The nature of bidding and the amount of advertisers in each niche as well as the quality of your site and traffic is becoming more and more important as time goes on.

The algos get improved, better for determining what pays the advertiser due to traffic quality, the tools available to advertisers gets improved, and getting rid of adwords adsense arbitrage simply means an unneeded extra layer is removed and isnt taking a cut out of the advertisers revenue.

This means more is left for the good publishers (and google). It also means the advertisers that turned off the content network will in time have the confidence to return. Its these guys that put ALL the money into the system - arbitrage sites simply take some out - So income and advertisers bid prices should improve even on areas where there currently does not seem to be enough inventory.

The point is that just because you are seeing revenue drop it does not apply across the board. In fact many of us are seeing the exact opposite! I am seeing both across a bunch of sites and the ones that deserve to be earning more now are! And the ones that dont now are not!

[edited by: Genuine1 at 1:48 pm (utc) on June 26, 2007]

woop01

1:44 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It's the end of the quarter and Google is surely taking 70% or more from most ads right now.

Do you have anything more than annecdotal evidence to support this claim?

europeforvisitors

2:09 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)



The logical way to avoid problems with your adsense account would be to bypass google and go direct to the clients. Why don't more people simply follow this path if they have quality sites?

Many publishers do sell ads directly to advertisers (either on their own or with rep firms), but that doesn't mean they can't or shouldn't run AdSense ads, too.

Remember AdSense ads are--for the most part--contextual ads from many different advertisers (including small advertisers) that are targeted to the topic of a page. Selling and distributing such ads requires the services of a middleman (in this case, Google) that can aggregate impressions or clicks across many different sites while attracting advertisers--including mom-and-pop businesses--that wouldn't be cost-effective to reach with direct sales.

If you look at big media sites like Nytimes.com, you'll see that they often run run-of-site or run-of-section display ads and AdSense contextual text ads, because the two types of advertising complement each other nicely.

loudspeaker

3:45 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think the reasons are:

1) You need your own ad platform to serve ads. Not sure how much it'd cost, but my guess is that something like DART is not cheap.

2) You need to sell your own ad space. As people pointed out, it could be a full-time job.

3) Most agencies and/or large advertisers will not even talk to you unless you have something like 10 million impressions per month. If you're under that, you are far too small for them to bother buying anything from you directly.

Those are the main reasons, in my opinion.

wrgvt

5:55 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



You also have to send invoices, process remittances, and figure out how to handle those situations where they don't pay or take forever to send the check.

Are you going to sell ads by clicks, impressions, or a straight fee? If it's by clicks or impressions, whose software are you going to use to track that (and will your advertisers approve of that software)?

Are you going to have multiple advertisers sharing the same ad space? How are you going to rotate that and keep them all happy?

Will the ads be served to your web page by the advertiser or served from your site? Will you have prior approval for the ads or can they change at any time?

jetteroheller

6:19 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The funny part of all

When I visit a fair and tell somebody "internet promotion", he will tell me, that he has a total perfect web site and does not need my service.

When I visit a fair and start making photos, he will ask me for what magazine I work and will work great with me together, that I can make great pages about his product and with Google ads from all his competitors. Sure, when somebody clicks on "contact" he will also see his address.

Some friends asked me, why I do not try to negotiate about direct ads on this pages. Again, the answer is simple.

Every good newspaper has the journalists seperated from the department selling advertising. So You can approach the person as a journalist or as a salesman for advertising. Both in one person is strange and not ususl.

So I approach the person as a journalist. My ad selling department is Google.

incrediBILL

7:31 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The reason people don't do what you suggest is that it can be a full time job to get and maintain advertisers. Many folks using adsense are not computer experts and have a 'real job' to do.

You can simple post a link "ADVERTISE HERE" which has worked for my site for 10 years.

Companies like AdBrite supply all the code and backend facilities for a mere 25% of your total.

However, I wrote my own and take 97% after the credit card fees.

You also have to send invoices, process remittances, and figure out how to handle those situations where they don't pay or take forever to send the check.

That's not true at all as you can have them auto-billed for recurring ads automatically even using Paypal, it's all quite trivial.

Besides, who cares how long the check takes?

You only run ads a) after the check arrives and b) after the check clears the bank unless you accept checks online. I don't accept checks because checks are work and people in business that don't even have a credit card probably can't clear a check in the first place.

My ad selling department is Google

Google supplements by direct sales of ads and supplies diversity for my visitors but they aren't a replacement. I've run a 3 month campaign for a very large vendor for $10K/month and that was just ONE ad placement, and a $1/CPC 3 month product lead campaign for another vendor, paid out about the same, so on and so forth.

I finally dumped the big vendors and haven't done them in a couple of years because they were a total pain wanting all sorts of nonsense like like specific demographic targeting narrower than by country, which I won't even attempt for $30K, not worth my time.

However, focusing on the small advertisers was perfect. I have 5 non-rotating text ads per section/category, $50 minimum per advertiser per spot. When you total up all the sections and now my new per location ads (country, state, etc.) there's a substantial total of $$$,$$$.00 in ad space and it's at least half full. ;)

Many of my smaller advertisers claim I send them the bulk of their traffic so not advertising on my site is akin to getting dropped in Google for the organic traffic crowd.

[edited by: incrediBILL at 7:33 pm (utc) on June 26, 2007]

kidder

10:54 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yeah this was what I was getting at - I am thinking that I will have my own script developed that works on a priority system - If I have advertisers in my network then they get served first - over and above any other 3rd party ads. I understand this is not going to work for all sites but I can offer good value to advertisers. The only concern I have is what might happen to my Google organic rankings if I start making changes... (paraniod maybe)