Forum Moderators: martinibuster
You may be in a market that supports a $30 eCPM, but do you honestly think that you are delivering $30 eCPM value to your advertisers?
It didn't take much effort to find your sites, If you were getting $30 eCPM for 6 months, count your blessings, and I hope you invested it wisely, because I really doubt that you were delivering clicks that were worth anywhere near that much.
My average stats since last June is a 30.54% CTR with a $36 eCPM.
For comparison, my non-sales-oriented pro-bono site has something of the order of $1--$2 eCPM over multiple ad networks.
It really does depend on your material and your user demographics.
Rgds
Damon
[edited by: DamonHD at 7:29 am (utc) on Mar. 27, 2007]
One of your sites doesn't even have any useful information on the home page, just blurbs about what is inside. How is it that people find those interesting and useful articles if they are clicking on ads? And AdSense is in the least prominent blocks on the page.
None of my sites could ever hope to reach that CTR, because people actually seem to find the content useful. You see, on my sites, the average visitor will view between 5 and 12 pages. Included in those averages are the people that hit back or view only one page then click an ad.
I don't know, nor do I really care, how good of an option trader you are. But your claims on adsense are way off base. There are certain content *pages* that might be able to hit double digit CTR, but *accounts* that hit that sort of CTR are usually associated with MFAs.
Hmmm, $36 eCPM with a 30% CTR, that's 12 cents a click. I would have thought good leads in the financial sector would be worth more than that. Are you still getting the same CTR, now that you are making a lower eCPM?
[edited by: BigDave at 5:26 pm (utc) on Mar. 27, 2007]