Forum Moderators: martinibuster
It would make sense that Google would do an audit before making a payment--there must be thousands of accounts that never earn $100. Not a good use of resource to audit those.
But I think that only happens with the small-time fraudsters. Google does monitor activity constantly and people can be nailed at any time.
Not a good use of resource to audit those.
I agree with you it would help to lessen resources in use. But it is not very logical from the point of invalid clicks. What if somebody has invalid clicks for $50, and would only reach 100 in 3 months? Doubt Google would wait those 3 months holding advertisers money (money for invalid clicks). Think they should be running process at least once per month.A few guesses on the subject...
I think the majority of accounts never get a check, kinda like most actors never get in a movie, so checking monthly could be an enormous resource drain. I'd also suspect that any one running click fraud will run it to the point of getting a check rather quickly.
If all that's right, statistically any account that doesn't make $100 should be likely to be somewhat legit or only minimally corrupt.
I think the majority of accounts never get a check
:)
[edited by: Jack_Bauer at 3:07 am (utc) on Jan. 19, 2007]