Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Has your experience with the image ads good or not?
I don't see any buttons that allow the segregation of text & image ads in the stats. I was expecting there would be one so as to be able to evaluate them better.
That is why we are getting anxious about running them, more so that they are running as leaderboards on our site. With text ads, you have at least 4-5 choices of ads that could potentially grab the attention of the reader. Now with the image ads, you have 1. As an advertiser, it is great for branding; but as for publisher, still a question mark for us.
We'll test it for a week and see how it goes.
From what I saw, all I really needed to do was change my account default to show both text and image ads. Adding the code google_ad_type = "text_image"; is a way to override the default, right? So if that is my default, then I didn't need to make any change to my existing ad code, right?
I'm not sure if it was the theme of the ads, which were for lodging in an area that my site is somewhat slanted toward or the fact that the image ad touted a cheap upgrade for same..
I do not see as many ads of that type after about a four day run and my EPC has dropped to the toilet.
Unsure why the ads are not appearing any longer, either bad conversion for the adverts or maybe out of budget for the month.. but I'd love to see them back
Your AdSense reports will not show image ad clicks separately from text ads clicks at this time.
As image ads inventory gets bigger, I hope that this will be something that they will provide. It is important to assess the performance of image vis-a-vis text ads. If image ads do well, then G can expect more publishers to run it.
It must have been that!
The site targets around quite a competative area, and of course it will be the highest bidder that gets the image ad displayed.
I think this might work out nicely...
Google turned away seemingly lucrative banner ads early on and focused instead on less offensive text-based AdWords. The letter proved to have far higher click-through. Google AdWords CTR =5%, Banner ads CTR=0.44%"
Google turned banner ads because it wanted to offer keyword-targeted ads on its SERPs. Remember, until Google began offering AdSense "image ads" last week, the vast majority of banner ads were run-of-network or run-of-category...and none were matched to specific keywords or keyphrases, because the online advertising industry hadn't developed a mechanism for selling and serving such ads.
While it is too early (cannot make statistical generalizations on 1 day), but we are very encouraged with the results. We will definitely keep on running image ads and see how it goes for a month.
Please share your findings when you do in fact have a good sample size. My first thought would be that they would not be any much better (possibly worse) preforming than text ads. It would be very worthwhile to see members results when in face a month has passed.
Might have to click on that enable button after all!
Impressions, EPC and CTR stayed within our normal range this month, but revenue was awesome.
Anyway, what I will be doing is lurking in the AdWords forum looking for discussions about the comparative cost and CTR of image campaigns. AdSense publishers just don't have the tools for measuring how they perform, but the advertisers do.
Last week when we started to see image ads, our revenues were pushed to the next level. As a result, revenues for the month is 26% higher compared to last month.
I just wish there are more image ads, not just in leaderboards that we currently see on our site.