Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google penalizes off topic content of GeektoGeek

         

Whitey

1:41 pm on Apr 6, 2025 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



This is worth reflecting on. A site that drifted from its brand reputation. Not even its brand status saved it.

Off-Topic Content Is Not Expansion. It’s Erosion. [livebreatheseo.substack.com...]

I think this is not an isolated case as I’ve observed severe reductions of traffic on some major sites over the last year. But those were algorithmic.


[edited by: not2easy at 9:25 pm (utc) on Apr 6, 2025]
[edit reason] typo [/edit]

Whitey

12:13 am on Apr 11, 2025 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Following up on this (to help engage more input) — SEO experts like Cyrus Shepard and Sara Taher have weighed in (plus a few others) pointing out that GeeksforGeeks wasn’t just penalized for volume, but for losing focus on its core topical relevance and publishing low-value or off-brand content under a flat URL structure.

This isn’t just about AI content or scale — it’s about brand dilution and Google’s growing intolerance for anything that doesn’t serve a clear, consistent user intent. Forbes had a similar issue, but only got a section deindexed. GfG wasn’t so lucky.

Curious if others have seen similar signs on their own properties or those of others they observe. Or are we just seeing the beginning of a broader purge?

tangor

9:15 am on Apr 11, 2025 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



When properties known for one kind of content FAIL to moderate their content to REMAIN relevant FOR THAT CONTENT why the heck would one think g would send traffic for NON-RELEVANT content?

As expressed, one can't blame g for de-ranking/penalizing. Falls into the bait and switch territory which nobody likes!

delorean

4:16 am on Apr 22, 2025 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



It is back know and it is growing more than ever. What a nice ride, geeks for geeks. Congrats for your revival.

Edge

2:49 pm on Apr 28, 2025 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



"wasn’t just penalized for volume, but for losing focus on its core topical relevance and publishing low-value or off-brand content under a flat URL structure."

I don't doubt this to be a possibility, however I'm reserved.. Explicit evidence is required which in SEO and SERPS nobody really knows..

Only Google and possibly G-F-G would have a definitive answer.