Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Reviving old high quality domain

         

wheel

2:49 pm on Mar 2, 2016 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'd like your thoughts on the following strategy.

I may have the opportunity to buy a 21 year old generic domain. It's a PR5 - and a real PR5. I'm familiar with the history of the site, guy built it in the 90's and got a lot of good press and backlinks. It's a site that I used to have backlinks from (it was one of my secret/cherry backlinks).

Q1) The only potential problem is, the site has had a parked page for about a year. So first Google SEO question - if I start to throw up new content over a parked 'Hosted by" page, am I likely to retain any historical love from Google? i.e. will new content likely rank based on an old, quality backlink profile?

Q2) Thoughts on my business plan? I'd like to turn it into a news blog site, but I can't write all the articles myself. So I was thinking I'd recruit say 2-3 other experts in my industry. Then we'd have a cycle of blog posts like this:
- D1-weekend wrapup from around the web.
-D2 - article by me
-D3/4 - articles by other experts
D5- week wrapup from around the web.

Monetization initially in three ways. 1) I own an ad network in the industry, so I have that :) 2) high end guest blog posts - I think I can get the occassional one for $500+/post if this is as high quality site as I'd like. 3) Develop email list to send out notification/updates, and allow occassional sponsorship.

Thiis is primarily, but not solely dependent on getting google rankings. I also have the ability to get some press on about 50 of the top blogs in my industry as an announcement.

Not sure how to pay the other other experts. It's the old don't want the risk, don't want to pay conundrum. I suppose I could pay a minimal fee with the idea that the experts are going to be writing to promote their own business - that's upfront cost but maintains control. Or I could pay them something like 5% of revenue, so no upfront costs but I'm losing control. Not sure what's more attractive to industry experts?

aakk9999

3:24 pm on Mar 3, 2016 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Q1 - as it is parked now, I presume it does not rank for anything? The backlinks it has - do they go to home page or do they go to internal pages that do not exist any more? If they go to internal page, are you going to re-create these URLs and make sure there is a content relevant to backlinks pointing to that page i.e. the content similar to what was there before?

Q2 - If it is a good content useful to visitors then I cannot see the problem on how you sourced it. Weekly wrapup should have some good commentary.

tangor

9:03 pm on Mar 3, 2016 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The domain has to be pure gold.

Assume no links will work unless you (as noted above) recreate the landing urls (do you know those?). As for what to pay for content, that's between you and the authors you hire. Make sure they know it is contract for hire work so you retain the copyright! If you can't get that, then work the best deal you can.

That PR5 is historic, not current. I wouldn't bet the farm it stays there when revived.

However, if that domain is good as gold there's a good bet you can do something with it.

News sites are either minutes, hours, days, weeks, months. The closer you are to the front that list is the harder you have to work. Daily is tough enough. Weekly is always doable.

If straight reporting and no commentary all are possible. But commentary will make it stand out.

I do like you've thought on this and recognize the back end hard work side of a "good domain name". I, for one, would like to know how this turns out.