Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 23.20.75.214

Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & andy langton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

How To Optimize For Google's Knowledge Graph

     
8:55 am on Jul 16, 2014 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:23150
votes: 344


There's been a great deal of discussion over ranking in Google's SERPs, and that's fine, as we need to get into the SERPs and win a great position if we're to win traffic. However, what about going beyond just the SERPs and optimizing for the Knowledge Graph?

Will the Knowledge Graph SERPs be as successful at driving quality traffic? I'm sure it'll be quality traffic. Well, that's what i'm expecting.

Let's try and create a list of specifics that will help appear in Google's Knowledge Graph.

I'll start with probably one of the key points: Quality content.
Without quality content the knowldge Graph won't even know our target is on the radar. It'll be invisible in amogst all the other content on the topic.
What is quality content? I see it as a combination of (preferably) unique, well-written, well illustrated content on the subject with both topical news and historical material. New material will help keep it fresh, and historical information will help with research.

Another point: Six degrees of separation.
Do you remember the discussion we had here about the Bacon number? Google's Knowledge Graph Demonstrated with 'Bacon Number' [webmasterworld.com] That was a little bit of fun, but it shows the ability of the Knowlege Graph to connect the dots and indicate the value. It's very clever.

A connection with a good Bacon number is going to help demonstrate a valuable connection. Notice I used the words connection, and not link. Without links you don't have a connection, but links on their own need to be true connections to influence the knowlege graph. Links are valuable commodities, but the value has changed over the years, and a link for link's sake is worth very little, especially in terms of the knowlege graph. However, the connections are worth a great deal more, and especially if it's as close as possible to the topic.
Without the connections you don't have a Bacon number at all.
12:26 pm on July 16, 2014 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member netmeg is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Mar 30, 2005
posts:12903
votes: 193


unique, well-written, well illustrated content on the subject with both topical news and historical material


Useful useful useful.
3:39 pm on July 16, 2014 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Aug 1, 2013
posts:1338
votes: 22


Nice lead-in to this topic engine.

unique, well-written, well illustrated content on the subject with both topical news and historical material


I'm with netmeg. That just plain defines useful and interesting (irregardless of whether you're target is a knowledge graph, the SERPS or return visitors/bookmarkers/etc.) Now I'm off to study Bacon by the Numbers.
5:56 am on July 26, 2014 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from GB 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member brotherhood_of_lan is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Jan 30, 2002
posts:4843
votes: 2


Here's another way on how to optimise, at least for the short-term.

[cognitiveseo.com...]

There's some good info in there in general about the box behaviour, but the bit about expired domains reeks of short-term opportunity.