We talk about page footers as if they are a defined entity and experts make comments about how keyword stuffed links in footers, and other abuses, can impact Google's assessment of a page. But what is "the footer"? You can use multiple <footer> tags in HTML5 and/or add a footer element in the CSS file, but "the footer" has been an acknowledged part of web page design long before those options were available.
So when a SEO expert claims that footer abuse with manipulative/spammy links is the likely reason for a site hitting a Penguin trip-wire, what part of the page are they actually talking about? Is it the part between <footer> tags in a HTML5 document or the css element... or what about older HTML4 sites without the tags?
To the developer of Site A, a horizontal line of links to About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions etc on a contrasting background might be the last visible content on the page and is their interpretation of the footer. But Site B might have those links in a drop down as part of the top navigation and their footer might be to replicate the main navigation so the user does not have to scroll back to the top. And so on for Site C, D etc, all applying their own differing logic as to what belongs at the bottom of the page. In other words, footers can be very different things to different people depending on the style and intent of their site.
From the perspective of avoiding SEO pit-falls, is it simply a matter of treating the html code immediately above the closing </body> as the place that Google will look for link abuse? If so that is not really helpful…. my closing line might be 1 line, yours might be 30 lines.
As you can probably guess, this is a subject that confuses me.