Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.197.66.254

Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & andy langton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Does WhoIs Privacy impact ranking?

     
12:06 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Apr 29, 2008
posts: 624
votes: 0


Is it possible that my ranking is not where it should be do to the fact that i block my real name in who is ?
1:27 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member netmeg is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Mar 30, 2005
posts:12928
votes: 198


I doubt it. I do too on many domains.
1:35 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Apr 29, 2008
posts: 624
votes: 0


ok just wanted to know
3:15 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

New User

joined:June 4, 2012
posts:21
votes: 0


no no its just a myth
7:01 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

joined:Jan 12, 2012
posts:397
votes: 0


I don't think so, most of my domains are private -- that said, something interesting happened to me a few years ago:

My WhoIs on one site was public, but then I made it private. Within a day or two, my rankings dropped like a rock. I gave it a couple days, and then completely panicked and changed it back to public. Within a day or so, the rankings came back.

I don't think that public vs private has an impact, but I do think there are a couple possibilities:

1. Changing your WhoIs could possibly have an effect in some circumstances (I don't know if it's true, but it sure *felt* true in that case)

2. It was a complete coincidence.
7:28 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:June 28, 2013
posts:2698
votes: 408


Sure, it's possible. Here's what Eric Schmidt of Google had to say about anonymity a while back:

"Within search results, information tied to verified online profiles will be ranked higher than content without such verification, which will result in most users naturally clicking on the top (verified) results. The true cost of remaining anonymous, then, might be irrelevance."


It's also easy to imagine Google being skeptical of anonymity in some cases but not others. Common sense would suggest that an e-commerce or affiliate site that sent spam signals might get dinged for hiding its owner's identity, while a Chinese political dissident's site might get a pass.
8:20 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Jan 13, 2014
posts:82
votes: 20


I never believed it made a difference but in the case of manual action against the site then web anonymity might be seen as a spam signal.
8:29 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Apr 29, 2008
posts: 624
votes: 0


Doesn't Eric Schmidt talk about author rank ? and not who is ?
9:14 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:June 28, 2013
posts:2698
votes: 408


He was talking about "verified online profiles" vs. anonymity.
 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members