Sgt_Kickaxe - Thanks for checking. Yes, [genesis] is a good sample query for reasons you stated. You're talking about Knowledge Graph results, and I've added the term to the title of the post to reflect that.
I feel that Google is always testing its serps layouts and pages returned, though, so we may not be seeing exactly the same thing.
Just to clarify, for the search [genesis] by itself...
...in the Knowledge Graph results I'm seeing in the upper right, I'm seeing a disambiguation of two possible meanings of Genesis, basically standard for Knowledge Graph, but with no images, elaboration, related results, etc, in the right panel. Just....
See results about
Genesis
Band
{17-word band description)
Book of Genesis
{19-word Book of Genesis description)
But when I click on the
Genesis link above "Band", Google populates the query [genesis band] into the search box, and shows Knowledge Graph information for the band on the right...
...ie, a mixture of text, images, etc... but all involving named "entities", real world things to which Google assigns unique names. On the left, as I see it, Google returns more or less standard Google results for the query [genesis band], including Wikipedia, YouTube, and various authoritative results, but not the same as the results you describe for query [genesis singer].
To get the [genesis singer] Knowledge Graph results you're talking about, where there are Knowledge Graph results also on the left, I need to enter the [genesis singer] query into the search box. When I do that, Google displays the same Knowledge Graph results for the band on the right... and on the
top of the left results panel it returns "Genesis Lead singers" followed by three lead singer pictures and names, each on a separate line, with fairly large pictures... but with Wikipedia and then additional Google organic results below.
I can't reproduce exactly what you describe, but if I click the "Lead Singers" bolded text on the right, the query box populates with [genesis band lead singers], and I get roughly what I described before.
What you describe....
...and a single wikipedia entry is the lone visible natural ranking on the page. There are no other sites visible above the fold...
...takes a lot of liberties, IMO, with what's on the page. I see the several Wikipedia entries plus two other results above the fold, and the page has seven organic results in all.