Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Changed site from static to dynamic and lost rankings

         

Super_Chunk

1:55 pm on Jul 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



We recently changed a clients site from a relatively small static site (< 20 pages - we used to update the site for the client manually) to a dynamic one using a popular CMS which they can update themselves. The new site looks and works great so the client is happy and it is build with nice clean code. The copy is the same and the pages have the usual on-page optimisations you would expect - all white hat like nice title / description tags (copied over from the old site) etc. The new CMS used different URL's (not .html extension) so I 301 redirected all old URL's to the new ones.

However, before we re-launched the site we did not have access to any stats info and it wasn't until we launched the new site that the client mentioned that they were ranking extremely well for a single highly desirable keyword (and some other 2 keyword phrases) that they are no longer ranking for! It transpires that the client was doing a lot better in the search engines then we could have imagined (we admit that we messed up on this one and should have checked first)

The client is now a little confused and understandably annoyed that they have lost their rankings for these desirable keywords. I explained to them that re-launching a site can take have this affect while Google re-assesses the site but now we don't know what to do. We see the following as our options and would really appreciate any input anyone has :

1) Leave the site as it is and wait for the rankings to come back (if ever)
2) Put up the old static pages that were ranking well and have these run in-line with the new site
3) Re-write the URL's so they exactly match the old ones (with .html extension) so there is no re-direct
4) Ditch the new site and put back the old static one

Any advice greatly appreciated!

Planet13

8:18 pm on Jul 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Personally, i think option 3 would be the best, but I ain't no expert. Hopefully others will chime in here.

have you made sure that there aren't any OBVIOUS things? Double checked the robots.txt file and looked for any meta noindex tags and that sort?

How many incoming links does the site have? Is the anchor text of those links relevant?

And also, is the internal navigation EXACTLY the same as before (except for the URL changes)? Is it the same number of links in the same places using the same anchor text?

Planet13

8:19 pm on Jul 12, 2010 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Also, you might want to take a look at this thread:

[webmasterworld.com...]

Super_Chunk

12:12 pm on Jul 13, 2010 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Planet13, THANK YOU SO MUCH!

So I really messed up on this one - I had not removed the noindex meta tag from when I was building the site. As soon as I read your post my face dropped. I guess sometimes you just need a little nudge to realise stupid mistakes!

I also took your advice and changed all the URL's to match the old ones and elliminated the 301 redirects. I then submitted the sitemap to GWT and it matched these URLs up to the old indexed versions.

Thanks again :)