Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
(I'm subscribed to that thingy in Google where if they find a new link to your site, they email you about it).
It used to take upwards of 2 weeks to get that email. And apparently my post was also indexed by Google 2 minutes after I posted it. How do I know? Because I just got a couple of visits for a keyword that the article was related to.
Anyone else noticing this increased speed?
[edited by: tedster at 8:01 pm (utc) on Jan. 22, 2010]
[edit reason] addition requested by Baseballguy [/edit]
If you will look at what the SE's are trying to do Viva indexing twitter, facebook and so forth is keep the serps from getting stale.
This now makes good quality content more important than ever, and makes us webmasters with multiple websites work that much harder.
Fresh content is a good thing just the workload and expense of maintaining multiple sites continue to rise.
I know we can login to webmastertools and request a page removed, but most our mods (volunteers) don't have that access.
So real time indexing has it's negatives as well. Another negative example, I recently posted here about a problem with an organization slandering another group/person in an attempt to ruin their business. They were (are) posting garbage all over the web and it is filling the top ten results pretty much instantly before the poor victim has time to even realize what is going on.
Of the alerts I've had in the past year or so for mytown-web.co.uk most have been for sites that mention the words mytown and web separately, missing out any mention of my domain whatsoever! When I do get a valid domain the results are from spurious make-it-up-as-you-go-along whois spam sites which as like as not don't even have the hyphen.
I dont see how it would be related so I doubt it.
Because part of the determination of stale v fresh is the 'freshness' of the links to the content and the 'freshness' of the page containing the fresh link(s). You have to think of stale v fresh determinations much like PageRank... Freshness 'cascades', 'transfers' from one page to another, depending on the 'freshness' of the link and the 'freshness' of the page containing the link, which is in part, of course, determined by the 'freshness' of the links pointing to the 'new' page and the 'freshness' of the pages themselves...
Stale v Fresh is *not* age of the content specifically. A very old page can still be fresh if it consistently attracts fresh links from fresh pages.
Anyone else noticing this increased speed?
That's how fast Google used to be during open beta testing in the 90s...I wonder if they've gone back to the original algo? Lol...:-)
It was a major wake-up call for webmasters who had an overly simplistic idea of how Google ranks pages.
Centers of influence, networking, asking for the sale, all terms from the 70's and earlier, all stuff that still helps rank in Google :).
It works, because no matter how smart Google gets, you're in line with their goals. Let them come to you rather than trying to figure out what they're doing and going to them.
Of the alerts I've had in the past year or so for mytown-web.co.uk most have been for sites that mention the words mytown and web separately, missing out any mention of my domain whatsoever! When I do get a valid domain the results are from spurious make-it-up-as-you-go-along whois spam sites which as like as not don't even have the hyphen.