Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Also, will Google link sites together by GA id? If I get multiple IPs, but use one GA account, it kind of defeats the purpose of having multiple IPs :)
What do you think?
Thank you!
I have an older site that has no analytics on it and always ranks in top 3?
Anyone else have nay advise on this...
First, bounce rate, as defined in any analytics package, is a very fuzzy number when you use it to compare one site to a different site. There's just too much noise for it to mean much as a comparison, too many factors are specific to the way sites are built, and it can also be gamed iin various ways.
Second, since Google Analytics is no where near universal on websites, what would Google plu in for this variable for the other 75% of pages in a SERP?
I'm not saying that Google doesn't use this data at all, but I don't think they could realistically use it in a way that hurts a site's rankings.
Analytics bounce rates are most useful when compared for different periods of time within the site itself - if you can get the number to trend downwards, then you are probably improving the user experience on your site.
There is another kind of "bounce rate" that Google surely looks at as a metric of their own SERPs quality, and that's when a user clicks on a result and quickly bounces back to click on a different result. Rven then, I think this kind of "bounce rate" factor is used as a measure of user satisfaction toward the particular algo that generated those SERPs, rather than as some kind of universally applied ranking factor for an individual site. Bounce rate is query term specific, at best - and even then, it's a very fuzzy number to use.
I work with sites that use GA and others that don't. I've never seen anything that even hints that analytics bounce rates are a ranking factor.
Analytics bounce rates are most useful when compared for different periods of time within the site itself - if you can get the number to trend downwards, then you are probably improving the user experience on your site.There is another kind of "bounce rate" that Google surely looks at as a metric of their own SERPs quality, and that's when a user clicks on a result and quickly bounces back to click on a different result.
I've actually thought about this quite a bit and always laugh a bit when people say their site is better because they have a low bounce rate or bounce rate should be taken into account... I have a page on one site with a +85% bounce rate which would seem bad until you know the page also has an average visit time of 4+ minutes.
The point is, personally, I think of what you are referring to as different kinds of bounce rate as two different things... Bounce rate (to me) is where someone only views one page on the site but is there long enough to make it 'count as a visit' (they probably found what they were looking for on the page they landed on: good for the visitor), where click-back rate (to me) would be your second paragraph where the visitor clicks and immediately clicks back to the results (they probably did not find what they were looking for and didn't like the site: bad for the visitor).
If you have 1000 sites and only 10 provide you with visitor data how do you apply anything learned from that data to an algo affecting all 1000 sites?
1) User opens the page.
2) User leaves within 2 seconds without seeing anything else.
If 80% of the users fall under this behaviour, then clearly the page isn't a good match for the keyword.
What you seem to be ignoring is just because someone 'clicked' on two pages doesn't mean they like the site. It could be because they couldn't find the answer on the page they were initially viewing and saw a link to a page they thought might contain the answer, which I have done personally and could be one of the reasons why tedster stated it's a fuzzy number to use... Besides, all you have to do is include an iFrame with analytics on it and it looks like the visitor opened two pages and your bounce rate has now decreased... How about pop-ups on the way in and out or re-opening the window viewed as a pop-under when the visitor leaves to change the visit count and viewed time? I think tedster said something about this stat being easy to game, but you don't seem to be 'getting it' for some reason... Access to raw logs doesn't help too much in some of these situations since it looks like the browser requested the page, because it did, even if the person using the browser didn't...
Picture this: You go buy milk from a wholesaler for your Brick store and wholesaler knows that you bought your milk before from other wholesaler(script tracks your referrers too) and people that came to your store did not like/buy the milk. If I was that wholesaler, I'd charge you more money for the milk due to just that fact, since no one really knows what other Brick stores are getting their milk from me for sure anyway. Just a thought.
But that just me. All kinds of Data. Money/Data = Math. There are NO MAYBEs in Math when it comes to money, specially at GOOG.
There are predictions and they named ALGOs, but no one really knows what they are.
What about interlinking?
As long as you keep a light hand about it, interlinking between your own sites won't cause problems. On the other hand don't count on interlinking to boost your rankings. The search engines are a lot less impressed with self-generated link popularity than they used to be; they want to see links that come from quality external sources.
Link between your sites in a way that will make good sense to users, then keep your main focus on link development from outside sources.
If Bounce Rate is high for a page which is supposed to make user click forward to some other page within a site - it may mean the page has some problems. Example: landing page in an e-commerce store.
Finally, it is quite hard to figure out what Bounce Rate is high and what is low as page rank on multiple keywords, so you should be actually checking it on keyword:bounce rate basis.
My opinion is a definitive YES : Analytics is being used as a Googlebot helper in issues Googlebot can't "see".
Google widgets in general: Maps, Analytics and AdSense, anything loaded through their javascript engine seems to be used as a Googlebot "helper".
Their widgets load in your page like Firebug does, so they can "see" all the javascript stuff and measure, benchmark, etc.
I've never seen a hint of this in either direction.
These were not thin affiliate sites either, lots of rich unique content, good quality links, blah, blah.............
I switched to Piwik after that.
Sure it could of been a coincedence, but come on, if it smells like a rat and looks like a rat, it's usually a rat.
That's all I'm saying.