Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Example:
My website is www.keyword1-keyword2.com and I want to get the top when someone digit on google:
keyword1 keyword2
As said in this forum now the rule is varying the anchor text in backlinks, that means I cannot take all backlinks with anchor
keyword1 keyword2. Then in % how many links pointing to my website with anchor keyword1 keyword2 do I have to get?
Coming up with an exact percentage may be a futile task. Google has not given us that information, it probably changes all the time, and I can't imagine the kind of network of test sites it would take to isolate and monitor the exact percentage. Add to this another factor - the website's trust rating in Google is almost definitely a factor that moderates how any percentage threshold is applied for spam detection.
The guideline here is that Google does not want to reward websites that control a great portion of their own backlinks. They are looking for a natural backlink profile, and they certainly have the data to know what that looks like. Stray too far from the statstical norm and those backlinks will stop helping and may even start to do damage.
In a natural profile, keyword anchor text must share space with a significant amount of "example.com", "business name", "Click Here", "Learn More", images with no alt attributes -- all of that and more.
We have a solid discussion about Natural vs. Un-natural - in SEO and the Google Algorithm [webmasterworld.com] in the Hot Topics area. It may help you why the search for a precise percentage is probably not worthwhile.
[edited by: tedster at 8:30 pm (utc) on Sep. 19, 2009]
From what I've seen by analyzing backlink profiles, even seeing 50% of the same keyword as backlink anchor text would be too much (unless those anchors also use the ".com").
Since this factor might also vary by market niche, you probably would get a more specific idea of the tolerable range by analyzing the backlink anchor text of your top ranking competitors.
[edited by: tedster at 11:55 pm (utc) on Sep. 19, 2009]