Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 22.214.171.124
I just came across another anomolous result, just as I was thinkging things were settling down.
Results 1 - 10 of about 4,490,000 for widget
Only 9 results appear on page 1. We see
"Image results for widget - Report images"
Nine listings, with the ever present wikipedia as #1. (No indented results)
"News results for widget" (One totally unrelated listing)
"Video results for widget"
"Searches related to: widget"
First time I can remember seeing Google count to 9 and call it 10.
[edited by: tedster at 10:29 pm (utc) on Aug. 1, 2009]
Changing the Title is the single most sensitive change you can make to your site. However, unless you changed the MEANING of the title, or added or dropped keywords, I doubt that changes would be worse now than normal.
Changing back will probably hurt more. Google seems to equate fiddling with Titles to being unworthy of a Page 1 site (occasional, difinitive changes to individual pages tend to be fine)
Admittedly I've been doing a lot of on page stuff this month - mainly around changing title tags / H1 tags that I thought were a bit similar - but I don't think they were enough to give me this much of a boost
I still don't now if it's a good idea to change 50% of your IBLs. Any comments on that? It seems to be really a lot.
It depends on what your current profile looks like. If you've been really pushing the envelope, I can see how 50% might make sense. but in the average case, I agree that it is probably not something to aim for - in fact, in the average case, it's not even possible!
I have given it a few days before commenting as often these things settle fairly quickly. Not so, this time.
I've had Bing as default on one of my machines, and it's noticeable that i'm getting what I want on Bing easier than the current Google SERPs.
I can't say for sure what's causing the apparent topsy-turvey SERPs in Google, however, I have noticed a good number of long tail, on-the-money pages from various sites are no longer in the index. Again, i'll put that down to some fluctuations yet to settle.
Come on Google, you can do better!
Shifts were taking place from positions 6 - 30. My site - like others that were shifting - saw the serp result sometimes correlate to allintext, sometimes to allintitle or allinanchor. Last weekend, the allins slowly started aligning, with the top 10 sites now occupying identical positions on the serps as they do on the three allins. I have not seen this type of merge of allins before, nor such a close correlation to serps.
Anyone else seeing similar trends for primary search terms in their sectors?
There still is a 2 year old "news" story showing top 10. When that is gone I will be sure that the churn is over for now.
Here's what I currently think is in play (at least today) --
1) A newly tweaked taxonomy for query types
2) An attempt to find the right recipe for blending whatever diversity seems indicated into just one SERP.
For some queries, this "diversity mashup" is not a big deal. For others - those that intersect several taxonomy slots - it can be way crazy.
>I'll bet they will do better, too - after Labor Day when the new experiments are tuned down a bit, as seems to be the tradition.
Don't you think it'll stabilize well before heavy seasonal holiday traffic starts in October. Better to have changes now than then. I sure hope so, that dreadful Florida update was in November.
The history of Google Updates [webmasterworld.com] makes an interesting study every so often. One thing I can barely find, though, is an update where our discussions were full of comments like "Wow, they really got is right this time." ;)
One thing I can barely find, though, is an update where our discussions were full of comments like "Wow, they really got is right this time."
That's probably because the algo SERPs 3 years ago were just as or MORE "helpful to it's users" than anything they've done since.
I get the VERY STRONG feeling this algo update was/is more about money and profits than actually improving the accuracy of searches.
If it is INDEED about improving the SERPs for users, than as many people have said in this ever-running thread,
"too many cooks in the kitchen"
How many PHDs and patents and "new ideas" does it take to improve the basic design of the wheel or apple pie?
At a certain point, it's just shuffling around the same pieces over and over again until one forgets how the original pieces fit together.
3 years ago, I could find anything I wanted. Usually not on the first search. However, as I modified my search terms, I got there. That is no longer the case.
But the thing is, most searchers are browsing. They're looking for general information. The result is a dumbing down of content. As frequently comes up here, Google is less inclined to return what you searched for, but rather what they think you meant to search for. This causes fuzzy SERPs filled with irrelevant results. Very, very annoying.
There is also a confirmation-bias problem. On "our" terms, we think people making that search are looking for sites like ours. Actual analysis of behaviour might show that more people are interested in another TYPE of site. Google includes more of that type of site, SERPs looks completely different, and (as far as we are concerned), stuffed full of irrelevant results.
As for the lack of "they got this right", the fact is we all think good outcomes are our hard work, and bad outcomes are due to poor Google algorithms
Google is less inclined to return what you searched for, but rather what they think you meant to search for.
There in lies the problem. Google is trying to think for the visitor.
I've had numerous clients, family members who don't know what a serp is or what seo means, or wouldn't know a webmaster if one fell in their head ask me, "what's up with Google lately, I can't find thinks like I used to."
The average user is noticing that the serps of Google are not what they used to be.
Things stayed "normal" for the past week.
Now, again, I see today another shuffle in rankings, identical shifted rankings to what I saw last week on Monday.
Anyone else noticing a shuffle these past 24 hours?
Also, TEST the new search engine live at [www2.sandbox.google.com...] . I am curious to see feedback from everyones SERP's on this new engine at [www2.sandbox.google.com...] . I've lost TONS of rankings on the current google.com, but on the new test server my rankings are back where they should be. Could this be why the current SERP's are so screwy? I hope Google rolls this out ASAP.
As for the new SERPs, I have about 95% of my SERPs - I only see one SERP where I've dissappeared, but I think I can attribute that to a goo hiccup. The rest of the SERPs are about the same for me on the www2.sandbox... The only thing I noticed is that it is no frills - no images inserted in the SERPs, no Google Base, no ads. I suspect this may be the reason the new SERPs feel faster right now - it is all just basic SERPs...
(My site is an authority site - many different categories, hundreds of thousands of listings, most SERPs are double listings for our site, been around for 11 years now.)
Also, TEST the new search engine live at [www2.sandbox.google.com...] . I am curious to see feedback from everyones SERP's on this new engine
Those results look like the last time Google was really bad made worse.