Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.227.5.198

Message Too Old, No Replies

Class-C and Whois

     

cangoou

9:35 am on Jul 27, 2009 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member



Hello! You always find SEOs hiring different Class-C IPs to make Google believe that links are from different persons. But doesn't Google look at the whois-data as well and not only at the IPs? I mean, you may have links from 100 Class-C-different IPs, but all with the same whois: Isn't that suspicious as well? I'm asking because I know a SEO which does only different IPs and NOT different whois and it seems to work somehow.

encyclo

7:38 pm on Jul 27, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member encyclo is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



Whois data, toolbar data, AdSense and Analytics data, data from ISPs, click-thru patterns... there are a multitide of data points that Google can use to identify networks. Just relying on links from different C-class IP addresses when the other factors haven't been addressed is rarely in itself sufficient to pass under the radar.

dhaliwal

6:11 am on Jul 28, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



i am having websites on different C Class IPs
And also have different Who Is for them. Some of them are even under Private Reg.

But, as we interlink these websites, i am sure, Google can know from linking pattern.

But it helps to some extent.

James_WV

8:59 am on Jul 28, 2009 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member



If a human can look at it sites and tell they're part of a network (which I usually can and I'm no 'guru'), then I would think Google can too

tedster

9:04 am on Jul 28, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



Yup - and especially if you begin to rank for a good keyword, you should expect to get some human inspection.

dhaliwal

10:28 am on Jul 28, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



@ tedster

you mean human inspection from Google or from competitors ?

CainIV

6:05 am on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"I'm asking because I know a SEO which does only different IPs and NOT different whois and it seems to work somehow."

Not all websites are looked at the same, and not all networks are analyzed the same by Google. But I would say that in the game of risk vs reward, the SEO you know is probably playing more on the side of risk.

Once any of the websites ranks consistently, you might get human inspection from Google and competitors. :)

dhaliwal

6:23 am on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Once any of the websites ranks consistently, you might get human inspection from Google and competitors. :)

From competitors is fine.
From Google, hmmm, are they having time for this.

tedster

6:34 am on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



Google and human editorial input [webmasterworld.com]

When it comes to "big" keywords, you bet that they have humans watching and evaluating the SERPs.

AnonyMouse

1:56 pm on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



and yet...and yet...my competitor dominates the SERPs for serious keywords, based on a pyramid of themed sites spread across only 4 or 5 servers...by all accounts, this should have been killed off years ago, and yet there he is, defying common SEO wisdom...aarggh

[edited by: tedster at 7:09 pm (utc) on July 29, 2009]

Shaddows

2:58 pm on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



Mmm. Tightly focussed sites that are on topic and heavily interlinked looks more like a gaming empire, rather then a gamed system. If its 'above board' (no attempt to hide the interactions), I can't see the problem.

In fact, I would say its more of a problem if Google penalised such situations. A consumer of such services might like to be able to roam between gaming sites, comfortable in the fact they are all run by the same operator, presumably an operator they trust.

Its only when you start sneaky interlinking-for-SEO that the big G should aim their counter-measures at you.

cangoou

4:16 pm on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member



If Google penalises hidden networks and doesn't penalise obvious networks - why should you try to hide my network then?

Shaddows

4:37 pm on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



Exactly. Don't hide networks. Just don't.

Similarly, don't try to give your sites an artificial boost by interlinking. How you balance these two is up to you, but I'd err on the side of "if its good for my user, its good for me".

Golden rule: EVERY LINK YOU HOST, MUST TO TO AN ON-TOPIC SITE- preferably an on-topic page

CainIV

5:53 pm on Jul 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"From competitors is fine. "

not if you have competitors like some of the extremely knowledgeable guys on this board. :)

cangoou

8:10 am on Jul 31, 2009 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member



Exactly. Don't hide networks. Just don't.

That means if I own 100 domains and think that Domain #101 fits in I could link from all 100 domains to this domain and google would not punish me?

Shaddows

9:34 am on Jul 31, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



That means if I own 100 domains and think that Domain #101 fits in

If GOOGLE thinks it fits, analysis of similar situations suggests you should be fine, but there are caveats.

First amongst them is that each of those sites should enjoy a independant backlink profile, and that Site101 should have links other than from Sites(1-100). Homogenous backlinks look spammy.

Otherwise, if its done above board, you are unlikely to get penalised. The links probably will have less pop than other links, but actual penalties are unlikely.

A "penalty-like occurance" may be evident down the line. That's because the links will likely be fully counted to start with, then the association discovered, links devalued, ranking lowered. Not a penalty- your site is higher than if the links were never there, but lower than if the links were independant. Removing the links hurts the site further. I suspect this phenomena is behind the vast majority of "my site just got penalised" stories we get.

Disclaimer: The above is speculation. It fits with my experience, though I appreciate it is not SEO Orthodoxy. YMMV. Forum advice is no substitute for personal experience.

If in doubt, test

cangoou

6:49 pm on Jul 31, 2009 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member



Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

internetheaven

5:44 pm on Aug 4, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



my competitor dominates the SERPs for serious keywords, based on a pyramid of themed sites spread across only 4 or 5 servers

Google.co.uk by any chance? Big thing over here. One guy in the legal industry actually has each site as a different keyword in the navigation panel for each website. A network of 22 domains all with practically identical navigation panels linking to each other.

Amazing! Ranks just under us for most but above us for some. That's impressive considering that it took 3 years and 10,000+ backlinks for us to get to that spot whilst he's just tailored the 22 domains with 100 backlinks to each to cover the same ground as our 1 site.

Manual inspection? Maybe in the US where such things get media attention ... doubt there is a UK inspection team ... our results are the biggest load of spam you've ever seen.

AnonyMouse

7:30 pm on Aug 4, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yes, it's country-specific: google.es. He's not the only one, there are a couple more - hands up, we all did the same back in 2002, but now?!? Maybe you're right, and it's the lack of manual review in country-specific SERPs...just a matter of time then ;-)

CainIV

7:47 pm on Aug 4, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Personal disclaimers on SEO advice. Love it.

fishfinger

4:24 pm on Aug 5, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



doubt there is a UK inspection team ... our results are the biggest load of spam you've ever seen

They certainly are. Obvious (and surprisingly small) networks of 'directories' and 'blogs' being used to get 1st place trade/professional town/city rankings all over the shop.

brotherhood of LAN

12:14 am on Aug 6, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator brotherhood_of_lan is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Google.co.uk by any chance

I've saw similar in the UK, where there's a 'main' site with the brand name, and brand-location child domains.

Out of 1100 backlinks shown for the main site, hundred's are the child site, which are on the same class C and obviously the same 'entity' creating the site (a couple of dozen per IP). They rank fairly well too, for a lucrative market. To be fair they're a large company, but on the other hand one site would've been just as practical for users.

From the human POV, it can 'seem' less spammy when it's a well known brand or big industry player.

 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month