Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 23.20.79.227

Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & andy langton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

How to utilize 301 redirects

     
2:27 pm on Apr 15, 2009 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 13, 2003
posts:125
votes: 0


I have a site that is changing its URL structure and that is also removing a few product lines.

So I plan to do 301 redirects from old pages to their equivalent new ones.

My question:

For old pages that do not have a directly equivalent new one, what should I do with them (especially those with deep links/PR)?

Should I just 404 them or is it acceptable to 301 redirect them to the home page (in a general way, they would still be on topic)?

Is there a maximum percentage of old pages that can be 301 redirected to the home page before it would have a negative effect?

10:35 pm on Apr 15, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from GB 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member dstiles is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 14, 2008
posts: 3116
votes: 3


Detect whether it's a browser or bot. If it's a browser 301 for the customer's convenience, if it's a bot 404 for the SEs. Of course, others will say always 404. :)
3:01 am on Apr 16, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:May 26, 2000
posts:37301
votes: 0


If it's a browser 301 for the customer's convenience

Or you could just serve the browser a true 404 http header with a custom page to help the use navigate the site. I have served the browser a carbon-copy of the home page on some sites, but as a different url. That's probably a better bet than playing with user-agent delivery whcih might be interpereted as deceptive cloaking in some situations.

9:54 pm on Apr 16, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from GB 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member dstiles is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 14, 2008
posts: 3116
votes: 3


See, Seasalt? I told you! :)

I suppose google could get paranoid about different returns but I don't see why it should. The web site is there for the punter's benefit, not google's.

There are a lot of reasons for legitimately "cloaking" certain content to stop google etc seeing it. The important thing is not to give them "spam" content that the punter doesn't see. Google should view what they are given and make decisions on that.

My personal view is that google are calling far too many scares and people are playing their game - we have to or lose trade. It's time they settled down a bit. :)