Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Ranking new URL's quickly

         

Whitey

6:02 am on Apr 7, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



If 301's are out of the question [ for whatever reason ] and your sitemaps + WMT , and IBL's are in order, is there a way to speed up the ranking of new URL/pages, or is this always going to be a lengthly process?

8 months seems a long time to wait so far.

Crush

6:47 am on Apr 7, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Seems like you need better links.

Shaddows

8:08 am on Apr 7, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



New URLs should rank reasonably quickly on an established domain.

A new domain is likely to take a long time to rank in competitive SERPs

tedster

8:54 am on Apr 7, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yes 8 months is a long time. How many new urls, Whitey?

Are they changed urls on an established domain for previously existing content? Solid link structure - not long silos? No 404 issues? No canonical issues?

Whitey

3:45 am on Apr 8, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



How many new urls, Whitey?

The site has approx 5800 urls. Around 2500 of these were replaced

Are they changed urls on an established domain for previously existing content?

Yes - exactly the same. However, there is a different site design, which works fine on other sites which we cut over before.

Solid link structure - not long silos?

This is fine

No 404 issues?

A bit of mixture being reported in WMT. Some 404'd URL's are showing internal links with report dates from 1-2 years ago, which were removed over 8 months ago.

There are some 404 URL's reported with internal links that still incorrectly exist - maybe 1-200 or so at a guess. Not sure if this is effecting things. It hasn't effected our other sites.

No canonical issues?

None - all resolve to "/"

One thing i did notice is that some of the URL's have received a TBPR 1. There are still others at the same PR distribution level that are white bar. These pages are showing PR1 at best

The site may have dropped a notch shortly after the cutover - so maybe Crush's comment is a good one Y/N ?

[edited by: Whitey at 3:47 am (utc) on April 8, 2009]

tedster

4:12 am on Apr 8, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Getting at least some of the existing backlinks to point ot the new version of the url can be a big help.