Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

The Related Google Operator

         

flanok

6:54 pm on Jul 17, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have actioned a related: operator on my site for the first time and was horrified at what Google saw as similar sites.

i.e. realted:(then my site url)

One site in particular is a link selling site that has nothing to do with my subject matter and I do not have my website on this site at all.

So I wanted to know if anyone has looked into this search operator before and knows what helps define the results, to see if I can change how google sees my site.

I also want to track down where the similarities occur.
I can see some are related to the sites that link to me.
Some have no reference at all.

Any Ideas?

Mark

[edited by: Robert_Charlton at 7:26 pm (utc) on July 17, 2008]
[edit reason] disabled smilies [/edit]

Robert Charlton

7:32 pm on Jul 17, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



...what helps define the results

As I remember, related:url should show pages that share a common inbound linking source as the url queried.

flanok

7:50 pm on Jul 17, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi
Thanks for the reply

I have just used the link: operator to see if there were any common links comming in and I can't find one. (I know G does not show every link).

So this "links site" does not get its links from the same source as I do.

I just dont get the results at all.

Mark

Robert Charlton

10:23 pm on Jul 17, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



flanok - Google link: operator results are only a sampling of what Google sees.

Check in the Hot Topics [webmasterworld.com] section, pinned to the top of the Google Search forum home page.

The link: Operator [webmasterworld.com] - it's not like other search engines!

Try the Yahoo Site Explorer [siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com]. The results aren't necessarily complete, but they're more complete than Google's.