Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

New Favicon.ico for Google

         

Demaestro

2:28 pm on May 30, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I like the old one better but it could be that I am just used to it but it looks less like a "g" and more like a squiggly line.

What you think of it?

Bddmed

1:11 pm on Jun 3, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Maybe this is what they are trying to achieve with their new favicon: ∞

[en.wikipedia.org...]

(seems the symbol isn't supported in here)

Demaestro

6:40 pm on Jun 4, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



thecityofgold2005... it does relate to the Google branding ..... it is the blue lowercase g in Google

I like the transparency nature of it. And it is an ico file type.... only Firefox supports the transparency and animated ones so far that I know of. But I have been seeing more and more animated ones.

[edited by: Demaestro at 6:42 pm (utc) on June 4, 2008]

tedster

11:11 am on Jun 7, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Some new input from Marissa Mayer [webmasterworld.com] about the favicon change:

... we wanted to develop a set of icons that would scale better to some new platforms like the iPhone and other mobile devices. So the new favicon is one of those, but we've also developed a group of logo-based icons that all hang together as a unified set.

Syzygy

12:05 am on Jun 8, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I wonder if they use the same creative agency as Getty Images..?

Syzygy

webfoo

12:46 am on Jun 8, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I don't mind the new icon. Favicons are not that big of a deal to me. They've only ever given me nothing but trouble. I can't even remember what the old one looked like. Well, that shows how unimportant they are.

Demaestro

10:55 pm on Jun 11, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



webfoo, I guess if you don't use them then I can see why you wouldn't care.

For tabbed browsing I can't live without them. I frequently have 12 or more tabs open at any given time and the favicon is the best way for me to see at a glance what site is on what tab.

Day 12... and it has started to grow on me. I think because of how I use it for tabbed browsing it has more to do with familiarity then aesthetics.

[edited by: Demaestro at 11:00 pm (utc) on June 11, 2008]

TyWebb

11:36 pm on Jun 11, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Call me crazy but the Google favico looks the same as always to me. Its the capital G letter from the beginning of the logo. Am I missing something?

icedowl

11:43 pm on Jun 11, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The only place I'm still seeing the capital G is on my google toolbar. The goofy 'g' is appearing everywhere else now.

webfoo

12:55 am on Jun 12, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



only Firefox supports the transparency and animated ones so far that I know of.

I beg to differ - transparnecy is working just fine in IE7.

I can see how favicons would be better than a screenshot of the page, as done in the iPhone.

tedster

1:36 am on Jun 12, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Call me crazy but the Google favico looks the same as always to me. Its the capital G letter from the beginning of the logo. Am I missing something?

Yes, or at least your browser is - Google switched to a blue lower-case "g". Check out Google's official blog post [googleblog.blogspot.com].

...and by the way, welcome to the forums, TyWebb!

theskunk

12:06 pm on Jun 12, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Indeed - when I see it I think of the UK's BullDog BroadBand [bulldogbroadband.com] logo.

it aint gonna set the world alight... and i see some clumsy antialiasing....

[edited by: tedster at 12:53 pm (utc) on June 12, 2008]
[edit reason] add clickable link [/edit]

appi2

12:33 pm on Jun 12, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So who was first Guardian Website [guardian.co.uk]

Syzygy

6:04 pm on Jun 12, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Well, if links to similar examples are okay, here's why I mentioned Getty Images earlier...

Getty Images [gettyimages.com]

Syzygy

tedster

6:44 pm on Jun 12, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yes, we decided to allow some links in this case. Now we know that other companies also use a lower case "g" for their favicon. So thanks for the examples everyone - and let's let it go.

Brett_Tabke

12:20 pm on Aug 4, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I think they are fighting the label "G" for Google. They have fought the use of the word as a verb, and now they are fighting for the usage "Google".

I've been pretty tuned into this branding exercise of the last couple years. It really accelerated when Lincoln abruptly switch from naming their cars words, to naming them initials. The theory is that they want people to refer to "driving a Lincoln" and not driving a "Zephyr " or "Navigator". Using initials like (mks, mkx, mkz) is like Mercedes and BMW that use numbers and letters for cars instead of names. Who says, "Ya, I have a 320i" - they don't - they say, "I drive a BMW". That way, all the "feel goods" go to the brand and not some word like "town car".

Google, does not want to be known as G, they want to be known as "Google". If you notice - especially around here - we have started just referring to them as "G" for about a year. It devalues the Google brand.

A lower case squiggly g is less of an insinuation or evoking of G as a single letter. (more brand-able)

This 45 message thread spans 2 pages: 45