Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
My webpage used to:
- Rank #1 and #2 on Google and Yahoo for a competitive keyword.
- Rich content and keyword density.
I have just redesigned it with more pictures and less text, and the ranking for this page has been decreased: (of course, it is more beautiful and user-friendly)
Google - from #1 to #2
Yahoo - #5 to # 8
So both Google and Yahoo now see content as the most important factor to rank a page? I have read things about this, I did not believe it, I did believe in links, now I think in different way and learn a hard lesson: "content is king" - what you have known for years.
And what I want to ask you here: how long is a long article, I mean how many words (minimum) an article should be in order to get high ranking?
Thank you,
Lkr
However, I don't think Google is directly using either of those metrics. One factor that I do think they are using involves naturally co-ocurring words and phrases. A longer article is more likely to include more of those kinds of elements. And even basic co-occurrence measures are really old information retrieval technology. What Google patented this year (in 6 patents!) is something they called phrase based indexing [webmasterworld.com]. It's related to traditional co-occurrence in some of its effects, but it is more sophisticated in various ways - especially in achieving computational economies.
Simple measures such as word count and keyword density can only be a very, VERY rough guide to today's author. So I have no easy answer for your question.
If there's lots of template or includes, you may need more.
But reduce the size of 'shared' content as far as practicable - it bores readers, and it's 'code bloat' to SEs.
It's always good to remember that content is king - if you don't, sooner or later Google will remind you ;)