Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

What are good results? First 10, first 2, first 20?

         

FlexAjaxSEO

12:21 am on Oct 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



What are good results? First 10, first 2, first 20?

FlexAjaxSEO

12:34 am on Oct 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Let me go more into detail:

To me a good result is to be the same on all googles (.com, .fr, .ch, etc) and to hold in the same (plus minus one two points) position for 3 or 4 years. Hence being 20th for several years is fine for a complex single word.

What do you think?

[edited by: FlexAjaxSEO at 12:45 am (utc) on Oct. 23, 2007]

tedster

1:39 am on Oct 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'd say it all depends on the frequency of search for the term in question. Other characteristics also matter, such as how likely is it that the Google user is doing in-depth research, compared to just firing off a quick query.

FlexAjaxSEO

2:01 am on Oct 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Very interesting points, thanks.

peterdaly

2:06 am on Oct 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Position is a distraction.

More targeted traffic is the only meaningful "good result."

Case-in-point...

Recently I took my top ranking page on one of my sites and changed the title so it was slightly less targeted, but had the exact same meaning. It was an educated guess (at best) about what the results would be.

"BlueWidget Setup - Acme Co" -> "Acme Co Setup - BlueWidget"

For my primary keyword for that page ("BlueWidget"), I dropped from 1st to below the fold. I had held #1 (and #2 on and off) for over a year. After the change, traffic for that keyword dropped like a rock...down over 90%.

I now have NO keywords that stand head and shoulders above the long tail for that page.

Overall my traffic increased.

How? My "bread and butter" magnet keyword is gone, but my long tail for that page grew to more than make up for the lost traffic.

What's the lesson? The overall picture matters much more than any specific SERP ranking. Sometimes chasing ranking for a specific keyword can be counter productive. Not always, but this example is something to keep in mind.

jomaxx

7:25 am on Oct 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



To me a good result is to be the same on all googles (.com, .fr, .ch, etc)...
Irrelevant.

... and to hold in the same (plus minus one two points) position for 3 or 4 years.
Irrelevant. How do either of these concepts help define what "good" means"?

For me, the bottom line is that "good" means "findable". You don't have to be #1, but your ideal customer following a reasonable search strategy should at least have the opportunity to find out about you. That might mean you're on page 2, or only rank high for specific multiple-word searches. Or even (pragmatically speaking) that you can't be found in the search results but you have an organic link on an important page that DOES get found. That's my minimum requirement for what I would call "good".

onlineleben

10:03 am on Oct 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Being on page two or three can be beneficial as users clicking on these listings are usually more targeted than those clicking on page 1s top listings . They were looking deeper into search results to find what suits them best.

Miamacs

11:54 am on Oct 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



For academic research even position 19 will show decent traffic.
For free downloads, position 28 will bring in ...a few people.
For retail, position 4 already worths virtually nothing if the top three have good, on-spot titles and descriptions.
Or happen to be the manufacturers themselves.
Same with any kind of service.

...

If you don't mind, what kind of a business are you planning?
I'm curious, in what sector do people plan their strategy this way...?

FlexAjaxSEO

5:36 pm on Oct 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My area is < a unique specialty >.
I value very much the points made though as I am in europe I need ranking on local googles -- which is not the same --- as well as .com

[edited by: tedster at 5:50 pm (utc) on Oct. 23, 2007]

liborson

6:38 pm on Oct 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I would say only top 2 matters. I do rank for couple of keywords (I can not monetize) no. 1-2 and the others I focus on - no. 5 to 10. The search volume for all those keywords is about the same.

I do get 40-50x more visitors for KW ranking top 1-2 than those ranking top 5-10.

whitenight

7:27 pm on Oct 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Good?
Or what should you strive for?

I'd say strive for all of the top 10 listings.
(Yes, it's possible for "highly searched" terms)

Then you can retire and talk smack on message boards. :P

Think big, shoot for the stars, and then achieving #1 and #2 will be cake.

300m

8:07 pm on Oct 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My goal is to be number 1, but thats not always going to happen, so if I can land anywhere in the golden triangle I am happy.