Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Sticking to the English language Gs and using a generic search term we should see the same "foreign" pages appear in the various regional results more or less in the same order.
If one of those "foreign" page breaks the order and ranks substantially better in one particular regional G and it turns out they have a number of links from that specific region it would be a pretty good indication that regional links do help.
Any other ways to determine if regional links make a difference?
The information about this factor comes from Google engineers, and in this case I can see no reason for them to want to obscure or spin anything. Even without a direct test, I do trust this particular input.
Not really, as the test would involve only "foreign" pages, IP/ccTLDs wouldn't be a factor.
The regional "web search" results came broadly from two lists, the "Pages from #*$!X" results and a non-regionalised list based on allinanchor results.
G then intermingles them based on the strength of the regional competition, but their order of appearance remains based on the original lists so the first regional result would be no.1 in "Pages from #*$!X" the first "foreign" result no.1 in the other list.
It's looking for anomalies in the order of appearance of the "foreign" list in the various Gs that may help determine if regional links help "foreign" pages....
This should not be of this one way. For a little time we have seen like to these factors they are very important and I think that this isn’t better way.
The ip should not have any importance, since the companies of hosting here are very disappointing and we contract the hosting in USA.
And this one must not be a determinant factor. The same thing with the domains .es or .de or .it
There will be some solution to these problems?
Google WebMasters Tools option?