Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Minus One Penalty - a new kid on the block?

-30 Penalty's little brother and -950's cousin

         

1script

5:15 pm on Aug 27, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



OK, I believe there is now another penalty plague out there: -1 penalty
That's right, only ONE, but if you think it's insignificant, watch your traffic go down to half of one third of pre-penalty level once hit.

You'd spot it while checking if your site is hit with -30 penalty (as in [webmasterworld.com...] ): search google for "mydomain.com" . Quotes are now the only way to spot -30, so be sure to use them.

If you have a newer site, the search for its domain name will generate few results and, granted, you may be shown on the first page if you are a small site. Even though you would not be beyond 30th result, it's still the -30 penalty, only you have less results to push you behind of.

Watch what happens though if you have a site that generates thousands of results on a search for its domain name:

If you are #1, you are in the clear.
If you are about #50 or so, your site is hit with the notorious -30 penalty (numbers don't make sense, I know. Read the original -30 thread).
Now you can also be #2 as well. I have two sites that contracted the decease last week. Half of Google traffic is gone. It seems not as drastic as -30 (which slashes traffic 10 times) but still a penalty. None of the two sites had any work done on them two months prior to this penalty. Some link building but nothing out of ordinary (if we can know what ordinary is with big G)

Why in the world some company that collects stats about your site and has an obscure page about your site would outrank your site for its own domain name unless it's a penalty applied to your site that nudges all your results back a notch?

It's hard to say if it's automatic or manual penalty though. I was wondering if other people experiencing this might post their observations in this thread. Maybe we can even devise what's causing this penalty? Or maybe how to get out of it perhaps?

tedster

6:05 pm on Aug 28, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I don't know that we need to name a new penalty for this - but any time your domain is not #1 for a search on your own domain name (including the .com or whatever) it is a sign that something has gone wrong.

Bones

8:31 pm on Aug 28, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Oh gawd, we don't need another -penalty surely.

Instincts tell me that it's just a more relevant page showing for that query, perhaps due to a higher PR. Minus 1 hardly seems worth it despite what the OP says.

tedster

8:35 pm on Aug 28, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Half of Google traffic is gone.

That's where I'd focus, rather than on the domain name search.

1script

3:49 pm on Aug 29, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



@tedster:

It actually goes the other way around: you realize that 1/2 of traffic is gone and then you try to find a reason. Since my main site has been hit with -30 penalty for almost a year now, this is the first thing I check for on other sites.

In fact, what else CAN you check for given that neither PR nor number of links are updated quickly enough?

tedster

5:08 pm on Aug 29, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I agree - and I do check the domain name search as part of any website analysis. But my focus is then on remedying the penalty situation for the pages that bring in real traffic, not directly trying to improve the domain name's ranking. In other words, I see it as a sign of trouble, but not the cause of the trouble.

I'm still pretty sure that lowered ranking for the domain name search is a sign of a penalty for linking - a loss of trust, in other words.

1script

9:11 pm on Aug 29, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



@tedster:

Would you say that -1 is a slap on a wrist, -30 is a wack on a head and -950 a death blow then? Why different grades? I though trust is a binary thing. You either have it or you don't. There must be something else to it (at least in addition to link-related trust loss)

TheSeoDude

9:28 pm on Aug 29, 2007 (gmt 0)



Yes ... but it all depends on how bad you manage to funk up!
If you made some 'naive' mistakes which you didn't know would be labeled as 'nasty' you do not diserve the death row.

It's a matter of trust but trust is not binary. I would deleagte responsabilities to people based on the level of trust I have in their capabilities. (Big tasks to the reliable ones, little tasks to those less reliable).

tedster

9:32 pm on Aug 29, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



No, I don't think trust is binary, I think it's a full spectrum of possibilities. Trust may not even be an actual element in the algo, per se, but rather a convenient word used to talk about a big chunk of all the factors that Google checks.

I don't even pretend to know precisely what the algo does that causes a domain to fall out of #1 for it's own search. But when that happens, it almost always coincides with other ranking problems. There's so much to check, including whether someone has done some sabotage. It's a definite sign that a site is weakened in the eyes of the big G.

The first thing I'd check is outbound links - and whether they are all what you intentionally want. The hardest server hacks to uncover sometimes create parasite links in your inner pages, rather than full blown site defacements or virus download injections. And if several people are permitted access to your server, it's not unknown that such trusted folk sometimes abuse your trust.

1script

1:21 am on Aug 30, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



@tedster:
You're hitting the point I'm getting to in another thread of mine here about rouge outbound links. But on this particular site in question that is #2 on search for its own domain I only allow links to domains/pages that I review and approve. Being a forum though, there are plenty of pages with posts where people are pushing some scam money making schemes, p@rn and such and they all contain URLs which I do not convert into HTML links unless I approve the destination. I hope I'm making myself clear. So, would you say that a URL/URI posted as text might actually be seen as an outbound link and looked at negatively by big G?
Granted, I usually clean the forum once a day or maybe two but as it happens, Googlebot is always there to read the bad pages minutes before I delete them :-(