Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
As far as indexing and rankings are concerned, will there be any difference on Google?
As in, will using .php file extensions put me at ANY kind of disadvantage over using .html extensions?
Thanks.
If you are carrying legacy pages over to the new website (or possibly even if you're not) you may find real help in this thread:
Parsing HTML as PHP [webmasterworld.com]
You don't need to use the php extension to have the php handler parse the pages.
These will be brand new pages of a brand new site. I just mentioned the .html pages of another site to help explain my question better.
So then, if the brand new pages of this brand new site are all index.php, abc.php, xyz.php, 123.php, etc., Google will index and rank it all exactly the same as it would if the pages were index.html, abc.html, xyz.html, and 123.html?
That's probably how I should have originally asked this question. =)
Thanks again.
[edited by: Perfection at 2:12 am (utc) on Aug. 17, 2007]
So then, if the brand new pages of this brand new site are all index.php, abc.php, xyz.php, 123.php, etc., Google will index and rank it all exactly the same as it would if the pages were index.html, abc.html, xyz.html, and 123.html?
Yes... except that Google should never see a url that includes either index.php, index.html, index.asp, etc. Instead, Google (and your users) should see either (but not both)...
http://www.example.com/
or...
http://example.com/
For more information on why you don't want your index.*** pages to appear in your urls, see this thread, which appears in the Hot Topics section at the top of the Google Search forum home page....
Domain Root vs. index.html [webmasterworld.com] - another kind of duplicate