Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
My site is 1 year old, my home page ranks 1/10 and most of my content is ranked 2/10 not bad because ive only worked on it for 6months of that whole year and ive begun writing more, 5 articles a day so far with quality in mind.
I get about 600 page impressions with a click thru rate of 3.64%. A very large majority of my visitors are from search engines and social bookmarking sites.
Now my question is, should I focus on only writing content and adding articles to social book marking sites and let nature take its course with regards to links? So far its worked fine - do you think my page rank will increase as I add more and more good content?
Thanks
I am on the same route with you with a 1 year old site... What I do is, I concentrate on writing content/adding new pages 70 % of the time and leave a 10% to analyze my stats and look new keywords that i should be considering to increase the number of people that i may get from search engines. (It is interesting to see what people put in to search engines to find what they are looking for, and sometimes you have to adjust your site accordingly...)
The 20 % left over time is used to gather links from related sites that my site may add value to for their visitors if they added a link to my site.
So far it has worked great...
Zampik: This is also what ive been doin0g that also, using the Google keyword tool is great, lets me write about lots of things that I know people are searching for!
But I have a question for you, getting inbound links from related sites isn't that difficult arnt related sites in essence competition?
Mark: Thanks, but please - what directories would you suggest I submit too. Reasonable price and perhaps decent return is all I ask for...
With directories you pay for, do you have to keep paying to continue being listed?
Thanks fellas!
Zampik: This is also what ive been doin0g that also, using the Google keyword tool is great, lets me write about lots of things that I know people are searching for!
But I have a question for you, getting inbound links from related sites isn't that difficult arnt related sites in essence competition?
Hey Fiky,
I try to only gather inbound links from related sites/pages where I really believe that I can provide additional value for their visitors. (Ex: If they wrote about how to do x and y in one fashion, i only contact them if i have additional tips or have a better way of doing x and y).
If I see that they are in for this mostly for the money and their main concern is not to provide useful content for their users, i do not bother with asking for a link.
I have gathered very valuable links using the method above. The time I have invested in this very targeted link requests have definitely paid back.
Also analyze your own website logs to figure out how people coming from the search engines end up on your site too. See which keywords they use etc. even the not so popular ones. Sometimes you will start to show up on 3rd 4th page on a keyword that you never guessed people would use and you can then optimize your site for those new terms too and get some valuable amount of visitors. This is a step I took after i started to show up 1st on my main 5-10 keywords.
Basically the idea is don't get stuck with 4-5 keywords. Alyways Analyze and expand... Google keyword tool can help you with the initial keyword targeting but i now believe that the real information sits right inside a website's own logs.
Hope it helps...
It is a unique idea that attracts links from good sites and at a decent rate, not just a good collection of articles. I have been through that path and Google told me to mend my ways and just be bothered about links. And in the process if you can put together some unique content, thats just fine.
[edited by: McMohan at 5:03 am (utc) on June 28, 2007]
If your site's ready to go, don't sit and wait for the links to pour in. If people really dig your site, they'll link to you naturally, but you gotta do some marketing to speed up the process.
Don't go for higher home page TBPR, trust, or "authority." Just try to stir up some buzz. If your site is cool, that's enough to get the links rolling. If your site sucks, marketing will be as effective as pouring money into a pocket with a big hole.
You have a relatively low CTR, suggesting that your site has quality content (it contains the answers looked for, so there is no need to look further).
This is a very interesting point. I was pondering that myself - seems like in some ways, the better your content becomes the worse your site will be doing advertising rate-wise (especially in niches where all contextual advertisers are essentially screaming "Hey! I have a similar site on the same topic, too!"). But on the other hand this is ABSURD! Is that why thin-content sites are doing so well - people don't have any choice but to click on something?
How do you think one might be able to escape this vicious circle? I was thinking the answer lies in moving away from contextual stuff and toward demographic-based ad sales.