Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 50.19.57.50

Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & aakk9999 & andy langton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Would these redirect links help with Google?

     
11:53 am on Jun 20, 2007 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 6, 2005
posts:219
votes: 0


Quick question.

a client of mine is looking to buy a yellowpages online ad for the link. The links are redirects and look like this:

http://www.yellowpages.com/sp/yellowpages/ypout.jsp?linkType=6
&outURL=http%3A//example.com&impressionId=1
&listingId=1234567&searchId=1&id=9876543

I told the client that these wouldnt help him since they are not direct links, he insists they will. Although i probably shouldnt be questioning myself does anyone here have a definitive answer? Thanks in advance.

[edited by: tedster at 3:38 pm (utc) on June 20, 2007]
[edit reason] de-link the URL, fix side-scroll [/edit]

4:01 pm on June 21, 2007 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 31, 2005
posts:337
votes: 0


The href tag is what Google looks in. If it isn't to the external site then it isn't seen as a link.

Yahoo used to cloak their directory listings to Google to pass clean links and PR but run their redirect script for everyone else.

Using an http checker with Googlebot as the user-agent will tell you if Yell do the same. My guess is not.

A Yell rep told me that their 'local' results (used in Google in the UK) were rotated so if I bought a listing I'd see some time in the top 3 slots that make it into Google above the 1st place listing. Lies! They are fixed - if you are 4th then you will only be seen in Google if someone above you doesn't renew.

Tell your friend not to trust what they say.

4:21 pm on June 21, 2007 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 22, 2002
posts:143
votes: 0


I'm assuming google wouldn't see the following as a link to follow but I may be wrong. Would anyone care to comment?

<a href="http://www.example.com/cgi-bin/links/jump.cgi?ID=1470" target="_blank">http://www.example2.com/</a>

example.com being my site and example2.com being the site I link to.

9:11 pm on June 21, 2007 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:May 26, 2000
posts:37301
votes: 0


In my experience that will not be seen as a link to example2.com. The cgi function could do absolutely ANYTHING with that query string, so it only makes sense that Google would not give it credit as a backlink.

They may, however, try to spider the apparent URL - they will spider anything that looks remotely like a URL. That doesn't mean they give it backlink juice, however - just that they might chekc to see if it's a URL they haven't already got.

10:23 pm on June 21, 2007 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Dec 21, 2006
posts:569
votes: 0


Of course if Googlebot arrives at a bad pace and spends about 699 seconds downloading the redirect script interesting things can happen.

I've seen such redirects ( /fakelink.cgi?suckerid=1234 ) in both Google and Yahoo first crawled, then their redirect count as backlinks, passing PR and relevance...

But as most of such redirect-URLs are robots.txt'd down from the face of the Earth, I wouldn't be holding my breath for it to pass anything.

It's the get relevant links from great directories syndrome. Many of the "great directories" are also obeying the don't sell links / get into suspicion of selling links doctrine as well and are offering these non-link links instead. ( In fear of being filtered out otherwise, which usually happends to directories. )

...

9:27 am on June 22, 2007 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 31, 2005
posts:337
votes: 0


There are still PLENTY of good directories - both general and niche - that offer good clean links for a review fee.
10:20 am on June 22, 2007 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Dec 21, 2006
posts:569
votes: 0


...and usually a backlink.

...

I know, there's a lot of fine places, I have a list of OK directories myself.

But if I look at which of these rank for the keywords I target, it's usually the ones that have no OBLs and walk a tight line in between a PR sink and an "authority" site.

The ones that provide the best links usually don't really send much traffic, while the ones with such redirects are "popular" enough to actually send some interested people.

The SERPs aren't exactly in line with what I'd call editorial quality, but whatever. I just submit to both types... the only problem is that it takes twice as much effort. Soon enough there won't be such a thing as a "lazy SEO/SEM".

edited: although I'd need to check if that's still the case, for this update seems to prefer a list of related links better than the actual sites with content, so older, I mean old fashioned directories may have regained some of their glory.

[edited by: Miamacs at 10:30 am (utc) on June 22, 2007]

8:36 am on June 23, 2007 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 31, 2005
posts:337
votes: 0


The ones that provide the best links usually don't really send much traffic, while the ones with such redirects are "popular" enough to actually send some interested people.

Usually seems to be the case.