Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Grey text on white - would Google say it's "hidden"?

         

kdollar

3:39 am on Jun 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I currently have a website that has a background in white and has our website text in black but our disclaimer on the bottom of each page in grey (#999999). Could this potentially be a problem? Should I change the text to black like the rest of the writing?

BeeDeeDubbleU

6:51 am on Jun 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



would Google say it's "hidden"?

Assuming that your intention is not to hide it, if you can see it reasonably clearly then it is not hidden. If you can't then it is bad design so you should change it.

Robert Charlton

7:31 am on Jun 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



...our disclaimer on the bottom of each page in grey (#999999). Could this potentially be a problem?

This is something you might want to ask your lawyer. ;) Seriously, if your disclaimer is something that your customers ought to be seeing and they can't see it, then you might want to make it more prominent.

This is not legal advice. Only a qualified attorney can offer legal advice.

Robert Charlton

7:35 am on Jun 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



PS: Note in my post above... I think WebmasterWorld's software considers "999999" hidden, because it's adding some color to such text so it will be more visible.

Patrick Taylor

8:51 am on Jun 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



#999999 on white is not hidden. It's a justified use of grey to make something less prominent. If it fits in with your design, I would leave it as it is.

BeeDeeDubbleU

9:50 am on Jun 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I wasn't really thinking about what this looked like but having just tested it I don't know what we are discussing. It's perfectly OK to use this.

freelove1988y

10:31 am on Jun 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Great post, Thanks.

300m

11:04 am on Jun 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



#999999 is fine with a white background. I have never had any issues with it. It,s visible. I think hidden text would be more along the lines of a color code that is slighty different than the background, or an exact match.

potentialgeek

11:38 am on Jun 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Google should provide a note on this (what's the limit for gray on white).

p/g

BeeDeeDubbleU

1:32 pm on Jun 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Why? There are so many other ways of masking text this is relatively unimportant.

netmeg

2:21 pm on Jun 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I could see maybe where #EE might be considered hidden on white, but #99 should be safe.

ogletree

2:24 pm on Jun 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I have some clients that have their whole site that color. Please don't do this if you want people to read something.

sandpetra

9:01 pm on Jun 14, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



If search engines didn't exist, would you still do it? ;)

If it's part of the design and not keyword stuffed, I don't think it's much to worry about. From an accessibility point of view it would suck though, and isn't it about building for people anyway?

BeeDeeDubbleU

7:09 am on Jun 15, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



From an accessibility point of view it would suck though, and isn't it about building for people anyway?

Agreed, but when you think about it, as a disclaimer this is no different from printed material where they place stuff in very small print at the bottom of a page. I often get sent stuff like this that I really struggle to read, even with my specs on.

fishfinger

8:36 am on Jun 15, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



If search engines didn't exist, would you still do it? ;)

Every time someone says this it puzzles me. If search engines didn't exist neither would this forum and at least half the websites on the internet. The ones left would be built (and look) rather differently.

sandpetra

6:52 pm on Jun 15, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



BeeDeeDubbleU - Agreed, but us webby types have a "responsibility" to make sure sites are a bit more accessible these days, just because, we can.

I do think it's a bit of a double standard with print etc because everything could be made more accessible if anybody bothered :)

fishfinger - Of course I'm referring to Google Webmaster Guidelines wether you agree with them or not :) and wether it had keywords in it.

Hiding a disclaimer I think just for hiding a disclaimer is not ideal but everybody's at it (including me on some sites) although I'm trying to eradicate this on sites.

Quadrille

1:41 am on Jun 18, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'm no lawyer, but if I couldn't read a disclaimer (and my eys are not too bad), then I'd consciously assume that disclaimer did not apply to me - and I'll bet I'd win in court.

No-one likes disclaimers, but you'd be a fool to go to all that trouble, and end up paying compensation to someone who was, say, color blind.

Why not have the disclaimer on a deparate page, with a simple link "disclaimer" - legally much more sensible - and much less likely to be read ;)

[size=0 - or smaller if possible, please]<color=almostwhite>PS I am NOT a lawyer; this is NOT legal advice</color>[/size]

:)

netchicken1

3:52 am on Jun 18, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I wouldn't even go there with a clients site by even having the suspicion that it might be considered 'hidden'.

The consequences of the posters here being wrong, and Google banning the site are too embarrasing to consider. Not a good look, for the very minor benefit gained.

Why not put a hyperlink around Disclaimer, and link it to its own page.

Othewise choose another color.

There is an ethical issue as well, if your disclaimer is important then it should be in a stronger font than one that even the webdesigner thinks might be considered 'hidden'.

tedster

4:55 am on Jun 18, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I can tell you that I use #999 over #fff on many sites and never have had a problem. However, if a disclaimer is more than a sentence or two, there can be a "boilerplate" problem with having that same text on many urls, especially for pages that have minimal unique content. This is one reaon for supplemental tags, for instance.

I try to always usin the link solution, or an iframe solution, for longer boilerplate text, no matter what the color. That way it lives on one URL only and isn't there to confuse any algoritm component.

BeeDeeDubbleU

8:31 am on Jun 18, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I wouldn't even go there with a clients site by even having the suspicion that it might be considered 'hidden'.

IMHO #999 on #FFF would not be considered an attempt at hiding text. Try it yourself, it's still fairly legible.

We are talking hex numbers here and Google is clever enough to place a limit on the difference between foreground and background colours. However I doubt that it does this. There are too many other methods of doing this that are much harder to find.

fishfinger

8:40 am on Jun 18, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



SandPetra, if you're referring to Google's webmaster guidelines, please could you tell me exactly which bit?

They give an example of what they consider hidden text in their quality guidelines :

Using white text on a white background

Using CSS to hide text

If the text is legible then it is not hidden.

I regularly use grey on white or similar for text I want on the page but not in people's face. I've also had a site review by Google support on a site I took over which had a footer in light text containing links (where I was concerned that there was a penalty from activities of previous webmaster) and been assured that there was nothing wrong with the site.

roodle

9:11 pm on Jun 18, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Time-wasting post. Is a default style h1 in #999999 hidden? I think you're confusing it by combining this color with 10px text. In which case you could list countless color-on-color combinations that are hardly legible...