Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
I'd been linking all pages to the home page. Then each sub-directory is on a different sub topic and I've been linking each page back to the sub topic's contents page. Then I've listed links to all the pages in a given sub topic to each other.
I feel like this is a good user friendly structure as people viewing any subtopic page are more likely to be interested in the other pages in that subtopic.
But I lost a couple of those subtopic content pages as well as pages under them with the 950 filter or whatever it is. So now I'm thinking of going to bread crumbs which I don't think are as user friendly.
BTW this is an informational site on a history topic.
I'd been linking all pages to the home page. Then each sub-directory is on a different sub topic and I've been linking each page back to the sub topic's contents page. Then I've listed links to all the pages in a given sub topic to each other.
annej - This kind of hierarchical structure makes a lot of sense, but one point to keep in mind... it doesn't necessarily have to be a directory structure.
Conceivably, you could have a hierarchical link and topic structure but have all of your pages in the root directory. What you're really concerned about is click levels and PageRank distribution from the home page.
Search engines do not run on Microsoft servers - they use servers that see page.html and Page.html as two different urls, because by definition they ARE two different URLs. This can cause duplicate issues for sites hosted on Microsoft servers. On all other servers, if an anchor used a different capitalization, the link would generate a 404.
I agree what I have now makes sense but the repeating of anchor text to the other pages in each section may be hurting me in the case of some pages. I found eliminating the navigation between pages in one section fixed a 950 problem.
For example 15 pages had the same navigation like this.
widgets 1
red widgets
widgets making
difficult widgets
and so on