Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Does Google favour CSS sites?

Or will I suffer any sort of penalty for converting my site?

         

JackR

11:06 pm on Dec 18, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



After several months of studying the benefits of CSS, I decided to take the plunge and had my site redesigned to W3C (XHTML Strict)/CSS/WAI/Bobby Watchfire (AAA) compliance.

I should stress that the layout and the URLs have not been changed in any way - just the design.

16 pages of code for one page has now been reduced to just 3 pages, etc.

Can anyone who has completely redesigned using CSS please tell me if they encountered any problems with Google - specifically, were your SERPs effected, and if so how?

idolw

11:50 pm on Dec 18, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



should be no problems unless you use some ugly trick like hidden text or links.

simonuk

12:09 am on Dec 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Every website I've ever re-designed has increased position when it went css-based.

travelin cat

1:07 am on Dec 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



we moved to a content management system in css from static html... nothing but good stuff from the search engines.

In fact ranking and traffic are both much much better....

WiseWebDude

3:31 pm on Dec 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



CSS is the way to go, not only for search engines, but for page load times as well. Plus it is so much easier when coding, heck...better all the way around!

JackR

3:44 pm on Dec 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks for the replies folks.

Can anyone advise me which is the best Content Management System to use with a .CSS site?

At the moment the backbone is a custom-designed .PERL Content Management System. Whilst this is VERY functional, it's out of date and needs replacing.

So, what's the best solution for a modern CMS that works well with a .CSS based site?