Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
At the moment Google is updating their Supplemental Results. They haven't done that on all datacentres, and likewise on some datacentres they don't appear to be updating cache pages either.
Expect that those datacentres will have a complete new index uploaded to them in the next few weeks, rather than simply updating what is already there.
I have just changed everything and will see if this solves my "problem".
My problem -`as I explained in my first post - is the lack of activity from the google system, and the delay in uploading of the the new site into data centers etc, when the "possibility" of proper analysis, ranking, caching etc comes into play. I then might be one of those posters who seem to be confused, alarmed, aggravated and angry about Google's apparent lack of customer care. I hope not.
Can someone confirm/explain the processing cycle of Google - for example my home page was last downloaded 18 August - in some posts I have seen 22 September mentioned ("end of summer") - are these batch processing dates? If you have a site which is deemed - has been defined as - a low change / low importance site, are these sites re-cached once a month - or is it more complex than that? Can I expect action next week - or do I have to wait months (as some writers seem to have done).
I have to agree with some people (and I am new to this forum, so maybe I have missed something) - if Google have such an overpowering monopoly in search, why are they so apparently indifferent to some of the concerns of their users - they seem to be echoing the arrogance towards their customers/clients that the old IBM and the current Microsoft were guilty of - in fact most of the incumbent monopoly players in many market segments have held such attitcudes, and decayed away over time as a result. One writer mentioned MSN and Yahoo as being better and faster at indexing - which I have also noticed during the exercise on this new site. Bearing in mind it is the same billions of pages they are search organsiations are indexing, the other two seem more efficient at the front end - and the argument that poor Google has to deal with such a large number of ranking and sorting issues applies equally to the other two (and presumably other smaller players in the market). Do these firms have newer, faster, more efficient algorithms, organisations, systems and people. Have Google become fat and lazy, slow and uncaring to respond? Where is the solid customer service attitide we should expect from such a powerful organsation? Are they abusing their market position and their users? is there a real anti-trust issue here?
Apart from this - I really would like to know if there is a google processing cycle - and when my little site can expect to be treated in a fair and balanced way (wishful thinking ...?)
:-))