Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

2 domains - 1 has to go

Best way to go about it?

         

roodle

7:14 am on Aug 17, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi,

I recently took charge of a site that currently has 2 domains pointing to it - www.companyname.co.uk and www.companyname.net. After a site revamp a few weeks ago G has pretty much spidered the new .net "version" and partially spidered the .co.uk version. I realise there's a potential duplicate content problem here, even though G shows pages from both versions in the rankings at the same time (does this indicate there isn't a problem?). My client now says to trash the .net domain. How should I go about this? Should I use the URL removal tool first, then "switch off" that domain on the server? OR simply switch off the domain and let Google work it all out? I haven't had to deal with this before so any advice is welcome.

Another factor here is that there are some backlinks out there for the .net domain, not all of which I'll be able to change immediately to .co.uk . How do I cover my back so as not to lose out on PR in the short term?

Thanks in advance

foolsgold

11:21 am on Aug 18, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Simple, put a 301 redirect (HT access file if using apache) to point .net to .co.uk. All links benefit will be passed on in due course but there may be a few weeks of disruption.

webdoctor

11:22 am on Aug 18, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"switch off" that domain on the server

IMHO you should set up a global redirect on the .net so that a request for any page on the .net domain returns a "301 Moved Permanently" redirect to the relevant .co.uk page.

This is as much 'switching off' as I would do.

edit: it seems foolsgold can type faster than i can ;-)

Quadrille

11:25 am on Aug 18, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I agree.

Choose one domain - the .co.uk if you are aiming at a UK audience; consider the .net if you are looking wider. Seek the .com, too.

If you cannot get the .com, and things are really pretty new, there may be little to lose (and much to gain) by getting a .com name that you can also get the .net and .co.uk. - If you do not have the .com, then you are providing free marketing and referrals to whoever does have it.

Anyway, select your domain: www.domain.suffix

Set up a 301 redirect from domain.suffix to www.domain.suffix
Set up a 301 redirect from domain.suffix2 to www.domain.suffix
Set up a 301 redirect from www.domain.suffix2 to www.domain.suffix

In other words, 301 from every domain (+/- www) to www.chosen-domain.chosensuffix

remove all content from the old domains.

Put all your content at www.chosen-domain.suffix, and get some directory listings; where possible, get links to olddomains.suffix to www.chosen-domain.chosensuffix

But think very seriously about the .com issue NOW; changing later will be much harder and more expensive.

[edited by: Quadrille at 11:29 am (utc) on Aug. 18, 2006]

Bewenched

5:03 pm on Aug 18, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



what ever you do .. do not point the two to the same IP. the dupe content penalties will kill you in the long run.

roodle

8:41 am on Aug 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks for your replies.

If you cannot get the .com, and things are really pretty new, there may be little to lose (and much to gain) by getting a .com name that you can also get the .net and .co.uk. - If you do not have the .com, then you are providing free marketing and referrals to whoever does have it.

What? Since when is this true? Please explain.

Unfortunately the site has been around for some time. I've simply revamped it.

Choose one domain - the .co.uk if you are aiming at a UK audience; consider the .net if you are looking wider.

Hadn't thought about this. Does .net really have the edge over .co.uk for searches on "the web"?

what ever you do .. do not point the two to the same IP. the dupe content penalties will kill you in the long run.

OK so I pinged the two and yes, they are pointing to the same IP address. What do I tell my hosting provider to do then? Sorry for the noobish question...

Another issue here is that the site is on a Windows (gasps all round) server so doing htaccess isn't an option.

Quadrille

10:15 am on Aug 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



What? Since when is this true? Please explain.

.com domains have always had an advantage: write-ins, the human memory, and most browsers always assume .com, unless told otherwise. If people search for 'domain name', they'll be looking for a .com

Unfortunately the site has been around for some time. I've simply revamped it.

Then don't worry; the advnatages of change are outweighed by the disadvantages.

Hadn't thought about this. Does .net really have the edge over .co.uk for searches on "the web"?

Yes; most non-uk people would think it was a local site; .net, .org, .com are the truly international. It depends on your site and your niche, to some extent, but it's often bad news to be seen as a 'local' site.

OK so I pinged the two and yes, they are pointing to the same IP address. What do I tell my hosting provider to do then? Sorry for the noobish question...

Another issue here is that the site is on a Windows (gasps all round) server so doing htaccess isn't an option.

You still need the permanent redirect; the process is different, the result is the same - search for windows 301 code - I'm sure there's many threads that have included advice for windows servers.

Some may advise you to consider changing servers - but unlikely for this problem alone.

vincevincevince

10:41 am on Aug 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The redirection is absolutely essential. You can safely ignore everything else in this thread if you set it up properly.

Every page on the .net should redirect to the same page on the .co.uk

Quadrille

12:17 pm on Aug 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



But one 301 will serve for all - no need to do each separate page.

foolsgold

12:41 pm on Aug 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



You can just have one 301 and given you are using IIS this may be the easiest thing to. Ideally, you should redirect page to page but it is not vital. The general 301 is.

vincevincevince

12:44 pm on Aug 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yes, one 301 for all will do the trick.

But make sure it's not changing:
olddomain.foo/page.html --> newdomain.foo/
olddomain.foo/something.html --> newdomain.foo/

i.e. the bit after the domain name should be kept

roodle

4:19 pm on Aug 19, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So I need a general redirect for all .net version URLs. I get the idea but I think I've looked at doing this sort of thing before on Windows, but related to canonicalization. It all seemed to boil down to ISAPI filters which depend on the hosting provider sorting out IIS (on a shared server) or installing some kind of software component that deals with it. Alternatively I can do a 301 redirect on each individual page that is requested via the .net domain name, which is more time consuming but has the same effect. I may go for this option anyway, as the (asp) site has a base template I could write it into...

Ok thanks people.

g1smd

6:56 pm on Aug 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



You need a site-wide 301 redirect for all non-www and www versios of all domains, and all of them should point at the one www domain that you want to be indexed. The redirect must preserve the originally requested folder and file names in the redirection.

What will happen next will be that the www pages on the correct domain will become better indexed. They may well rank higher too. Make sure that every page has a unique title tag and unique meta description.

The redirected URLs will turn into supplemental results, and will continue to hang around in the SERPs for about a year. They will absolutely NOT be a problem as far "duplicate content" goes, as Google will already know about the redirect by then. If someone should ever click on one of those Supplemental Results in the SERPs then your site-wide 301 redirect will deliver the vistor to the correct page on the correct domain.

Your measure of success is how well the correct domain is indexed, and how the pages rank. Do not be distracted by Supplemental Results for redirected URLs. Google holds on to those for about a year. There is nothing you can do to amend them. Where they rank, they still send you visitors. Eventually Google cleans them up; at their own pace.

roodle

3:12 pm on Aug 22, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Just coming back on this subject - I've been told by my hosting provider that they can set up a redirect but without issuing a 301 code. Is this still a valid redirect for what's been discussed here?

Regards

webdoctor

3:43 pm on Aug 22, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



set up a redirect but without issuing a 301 code

If they don't send a 301 Moved Permanently status code, it's the wrong kind of redirect.