Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 184.108.40.206
Forum Moderators: goodroi
joined:Oct 15, 2011
Vringo is a tiny company that purchased some patents from Lycos, an old search engine, in 2011 and then used those patents to sue Google. In December 2012, Vringo won $30 million in a jury trial, but that was far less than the hundreds of millions it was seeking.
Today, Vringo got the payout it was looking for: a 1.36 percent running royalty on US-based revenue from AdWords, Google's flagship program. US District Judge Raymond Jackson had already ruled last week (PDF) that the AdWords program, which was tweaked by Google after the Vringo verdict, wasn't "colorably different" from the old infringing program. He gave Google and Vringo one last session to hammer out a royalty rate, and when they couldn't, he went ahead and set it (PDF)—at almost exactly the rate Vringo was seeking.
What is it that makes me pleased to hear this?
joined:Sept 20, 2000
Bear in mind that most of what Google has done since the original search engine took off has involved buying out patents and closing small companies.
The losers are not Google, but Google's advertisers; costs will rise.