Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 18.104.22.168
Forum Moderators: goodroi
I use my private Gmail account to email my boyfriend and my mother.
There’s a BIG drop-off between them and my other “most frequent” contacts.
You know who my third most frequent contact is?
My abusive ex-husband.
My privacy concerns are not trite. They are linked to my actual physical safety, and I will now have to spend the next few days maintaining that safety by continually knocking down followers as they pop up. A few days is how long I expect it will take before you either knock this #*$! off, or I delete every Google account I have ever had and use Bing out of #*$!ing spite.
But what Google viewed as an obvious shortcut stirred up a beehive of angry critics. Many users bristled at what they considered an invasion of privacy, and they faulted the company for failing to ask permission before sharing a person’s Buzz contacts with a broad audience. For the last three days, Google has faced a firestorm of criticism on blogs and Web sites, and it has already been forced to alter some features of the service.
E-mail, it turns out, can hold many secrets, from the names of personal physicians and illicit lovers to the identities of whistle-blowers and antigovernment activists. And Google, so recently a hero to many people for threatening to leave China after hacking attempts against the Gmail accounts of human rights activists, now finds itself being pilloried as a clumsy violator of privacy.
[edited by: Brett_Tabke at 1:32 pm (utc) on Feb 13, 2010]
People need to educate themselves to what they are signing up for.
The fault is with regulators, not Google
We have so many confusions as to what "opt-out" or "opt-in" means
The final straw came one day when logging in to sort out a Google Analytics problem for someone, and Google automatically attempting to link that account with the YouTube login that was usually used on that computer by someone else.