Forum Moderators: goodroi
so have you clicked on any? I think given that people go for videos clicking is less likely--short of a similar vidoe on another service.
thoughts?
Infact - Youtube - can I please have a present as a thankyou when someone says "doh! - why didn;t I think of that!"?
B. The YouTube Website may contain links to third party websites that are not owned or controlled by YouTube....By using the Website, you expressly relieve YouTube from any and all liability arising from your use of any third-party website.
And in case that doesn't work:
YouTube may, in its sole discretion, modify or revise these Terms of Service and policies at any time, and you agree to be bound by such modifications or revisions
(Incidentally - that clause should be made illegal in every contarct online - ever. What's the point of "terms of use" when they are so one side? But that's a different thread.)
[edited by: Receptional at 3:55 pm (utc) on July 9, 2007]
[edited by: Receptional at 6:52 pm (utc) on July 9, 2007]
Adding their own 5 sec advert on the end doesn't change that.
Er, no.
Gaining direct financial benefits from the infringing activity will take away their DMCA protection (which is where their whole service is based upon). That's why they are currently running mostly self promotional ads, if they run any ads at all. Even Adsense could be seen as "direct financial benefit".