Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

Is a static directory valued equally to a static page?

example.com/dir/ vs. example.com/dir/page.html

         

harleyx

5:12 am on May 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



A while ago I switched all my dynamic links over using htaccess. For those of you not schooled on this subject, that simply means instead of a URL being:

[example.com...]

it is now:

[example.com...]

This not only provides more useful keywords to a search engine, but search engines seem to index/rank static links more generously than dynamic. That has been my experience. Since I have performed the switch search engine traffic has more than doubled, and the number of indexed pages in the big three google-yahoo-msn has risen considerably (in the 2 months since I switched).

The question I'm curious about is this: does a URL with a filename.html ending hold more sway with search engines than a URL with only a directory ending?

For instance, would it give any extra weight (besides adding the additional keyword weight) to a webpage to switch from:

[example.com...]

into

[example.com...]

? Anybody have experience with this?

jd01

5:27 am on May 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It is my understanding thah the w3c has actually recommended (at sometime in the future) removing the file type from the end of the URL string. (Check their site for details.)

I have seen non-query string pages rank higher, because many SE's still either cannot or choose not to read information after the ?. I have seen more query strings in listed URL's lately though, so maybe things are changing.

As for your original question I have not noticed any difference personally between a 'directory' a page with type indicated 'page.html' or a page with no type 'page'. You might receive a better answer in a discussion that is more greared to SEO than I can give though.

Justin

JAB Creations

6:05 pm on May 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Shorter URLs are always better in general and as well for SEO with little or no doubt.

harleyx

9:04 pm on May 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



With regard to that, I agree no doubt shorter URL's are better.

But with regard to the extension vs. directory, do you think it would be better to use:

[example.com...]

OR

[example.com...]

OR

it would make no difference either way. Still curious on opinions of that particular point.