Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Who benefits most from 3 AdSense ads per page

Who is the winner? Advertisers or publishers?

         

fdmaster

1:20 pm on Sep 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member


Google has just rolled out perhaps the most important new feature since AdSence program inception. The "3 ads per page" rule overnight doubles AdSense market size and it obviously will have wide spread consequences.

It is rather early to make any definitive conclusions yet, however we already can see some consequences, analyse the changes, and make some forecasts.

I have noticed that number of AdSense impressions on my website has dropped on 1st of September rather significantly. The reason became clear after AdSens's "new features" email has arrived. Obviously, many webmasters has received this email earlier than myself and without any delay rolled out multiply AdSense ad blocks per page. Consequently, pool of available ads got exhausted due to increased by publisher's supply of ad spots and possibly there was knee-jerk reaction by some advertisers who pulled the trigger and dropped ads on content network until they re-evaluate the changing playing field.

It is safe to assume that not all webmasters have immediately increased number of AdSense blocks per page. It is most likely that for next few weeks pool of available ad spots will grow even further. This is a huge change on the playing field which will benefit some players and make the game more difficult for others.

Let's see how the market has changed and who are set to win and lose because of this huge change. Generally, the advertisers are the winners here. They instantly received significantly increased supply of ad spots while at this point demand for ads is not changed or maybe even decreased because some advertisers got scared off the market.
Overall, the publishers are the losers in this game at least in short term because market will inevitably bring prices paid for clicks down due to described above changes in supply and demand. The drop of price of click might not be compensated by increasing number of ad spots simply because CTR and CPM do not rise proportionally to number of ads on a page and demand for ads became rather stretched causing way too many PSA's or default ads.

It appears that this change affects various groups of advertisers and publishers differently. Most likely it will significantly increase click bandwidth for low tier of advertisers, those who do not bid into top 5-10 bids for a keyword. It might also somewhat decrease click bandwidth for high tier bidders, because more click will flow to low bidders.

One of possible side effects of all these changes might even improve the quality of the content network overall. It is possible that all those websites which were developed specifically with goal of maximising AdSense revenue and target specific keywords will tend to not have enough ad supply to fill all 3 AdSense blocks with high paying ads or even maybe not enough of any ads for all the ad blocks. On the other hands websites delivering "real life" content will be matched by wider set of relevant keywords and will display top bidding ads for a few related themes simultaneously.

In medium and long term this change benefits all players. Advertisers will get better ROI and volume of clicks and consequently more advertisers will move into AdWords space from other networks, existing advertisers lured by ROI might increase advertising budget as well. This in turn will benefit publishers. And of course, the most benefits will eventually be collected by Google’s shareholders (please note that this is NOT an investment advise).

It is also interesting to note Google's timing rolling out this feature. Perhaps, they were expecting knee jerk reaction by some advertisers and sharp rise and supply of ad spots. In order to minimize it they launched it 1st of September when ad market seasonally heats up. Apparently they also know that it is bad idea to start a war, launch new presidential candidate or new product in August, so they have waited until the September as everybody else.

Good move Google.

Vladimir Martchenko
2nd of September 2004

[1][[b]edited by[/b]: fdmaster at 2:09 pm (utc) on Sep. 2, 2004][/1]

Sense_able

1:28 pm on Sep 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have noticed a 20% drop in EPC over the last 24 hours, that is based on 2000 clicks a day.

So it could well be an overall lowering of the CPC. this can easily be ofset by me by adding more boxes

Great move by google lets see how things even out over the next few weeks

asp4bunnies

3:04 pm on Sep 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Very nice summary and welcome to Webmaster World, but...either you're quoting someone else's article (against ToS), or you just repeated the date of the post ... for what reason?

europeforvisitors

3:17 pm on Sep 2, 2004 (gmt 0)



I think advertisers are likely to be the big winners--at least those advertisers who aren't scared away by a further decline in the quality of the content network.

Visit Thailand

3:22 pm on Sep 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I would say Google is the overall winner however I think both publishers and advertisers do win.

Don't forget we only have the option as publishers to display more than one ad unit we do not have to.

Allowing more advertisers onto a page will be help some of the smaller advertisers to get their bids right etc and publsihers should benefit from testing different layouts, numbers of ad units etc to see which best works for them.

ogletree

3:30 pm on Sep 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



My epc's are within expected values. You really can't look at one day. You need to compare weeks and months at a time to really see a trend. My observations are based on 16K to 24K page impressions that cover a large number of subjects.

markus007

5:31 pm on Sep 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I have done over a million page impressions since i added multipul ads. My epc is the same as it always was.

esllou

5:49 pm on Sep 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



what about your ctr?

has it gone down to exactly a third of previously or some way above?

(presuming you have added three per page....subsitute "half" if you have only added two per page)

markus007

5:55 pm on Sep 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



CTR has ceased to exist, and only a few of my pages seem to be displaying the full 3 ads. It looks like the ad displaying system still needs some refinements.

howiejs

6:02 pm on Sep 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"CTR has ceased to exist"
Do you mean it is not being reported?
or there is a huge drop in CTR?

1 million impressions in 24 hours (since the ad units went online)?

Jesse_Smith

5:28 am on Sep 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Translation: As soon as two or three ads are up, CTR numbers will end up 1/3rd of the current numbers and become worthless.

Warning: Lower CTR might mean a higher odds of geting account deleted.

Mauricio

7:25 am on Sep 3, 2004 (gmt 0)



Good move?

I think that Google should make some efforts improving the quality of his advertiser's network.

Th only I can see, once and again, are new steps making it esay for content cheaters, pseudo-directories and search engine spammers. Why would really an user find up to 15 adverts in the same page? Why would need a regular publisher show low cost adverts?

As my sites grow, I better understand some advertising networks (i.e.: Overture).

P.S.: I'm seriously thinking about build two or three pseudo-directories and open an Adsense account with the name of my wife, the address of my mother and check-it from his computer.