Forum Moderators: martinibuster
One of the "complaints" in the article is that Google doesn't allow trademarked terms to be used in ads but does allow typo versions to be used to grab type-in traffic to send to pages with AdSense.
Here's a brief excerpt:
"It seems very hard to reconcile Google's support of this activity with their 'Do No Evil' motto," said Ben Edelman, a Harvard University researcher who has looked extensively into advertising on unused domains.
I wonder if someone at Google is beginning to regret ever coming up with this "Do no evil" mantra?
FarmBoy
I wonder if someone at Google is beginning to regret ever coming up with this "Do no evil" mantra?
In this case the answer seems obvious. If the site is infringing on come company's trademark, then the company can easily go to ICANN and get the domain back. If the site is NOT infringing, or at least cannot be demonstrated to be necessarily infringing, then what's Google supposed to do about that?
Let's face it: There are so many trademarks in existence that almost any website could theoretically be accused of infringement by someone somewhere.