check list for getting high CPC ads

How do we increase quality of website

[georaza]

Hi, After creating and running MFA websites I planned to create a single website with good quality to get better traffic , search engine indexing and higher CPC ads.

I am defineing the quality attributes, which I should maintain. Here is the list of them, if anybody can provide value addition it will help all of us.

1. Do not do the copy past of available contents.
2. Provide good size of information.
3. Target the high valu keywords in page title and file name.
4. Do not use the dynamic website.

[incrediBILL]

Do not use the dynamic website.

Dynamic is just fine if you use search engine friendly URLs.

I do nothing but dynamic sites, it's not an issue.

[moTi]

Target the high valu keywords in page title and file name.

this doesnt't mean anything towards site quality.
sorry, i think your "check list" doesn't take anyone further (point 1 and 2 tautologic, point 3 and 4 not valid).

[hunderdown]

I question your assumption that quality website means high CPC. There must be thousands of highly respected "quality" websites that just happen to be in low CPC subject areas.

[ann]

SHEEESH!

[hunderdown]

SHEEESH!

Exactly what I was trying to say, but more succinct and forceful.

[georaza]

I do not agree with incrediBILL about the dynamic and static site comparison. The search engines have limited quota of webpages indexing for dynamic sites. The search engines index static pages more frequntly and allocate more space to it in their system. I studied this thing in google search engine optimization resources.

[georaza]

I can give an example of targeting high value keywords. If I wrote something about "email to fax". I know that the "fax machine" has a relatively high CPC. So I can use it in my keywords/desciption tags. I observed that the ads adsense fetches sometimes considers these tages. Still the ads will display about the fax but the chances of its triggering if relatively high value kw.

[jomaxx]

That's why incrediBILL said "Dynamic is just fine if you use search engine friendly URLs".

Many forums in particular have add-ons so that a dynamic site can appear to be made up of static html pages with no parameters. This is great for search engines and probably better for AdSense as well.

Anyway I think what most people are trying to tell you is to forget about chasing the whales (high-CPC ads). In the long run you have a lot more options and more security if you have a busy site with an average CPC, as opposed to a site with little traffic but a high CPC.

[Thez]

The search engines have limited quota of webpages indexing for dynamic sites. The search engines index static pages more frequntly and allocate more space to it in their system.

Google "mod rewrite" and/or "url rewriting".

I have a dynamic site with 1,5 million pages indexed in google. Your point is not valid.

[YoungWildandFree]

"1. Do not do the copy past of available contents."

What about news and press release sites that run AP, AFP, REUTERS news wires and many sites that publish press releases?

[georaza]

People saying that the dynamic webpages are equavalent to static pages if urls are friendly. I suggest you to do a test just put this string on google with quotes arround it.

"web crawler can easily overwhelm and crash sites serving dynamic content"

and look into the results you received.

[incrediBILL]

I have over 40K search engine friendly pages indexed from a dynamic site, Google claims it's indexed a lot more but Google made a mistake, Yahoo's closer with 41K pages, but what do I know.

[GoldenHammer]

Google index 230K+ dynamic pages on my site, it use up 30G+ bandwidth in a month to crawl all these dynamic pages.

I would like to say what means "quality" contents -valuable to your targetted users, and possibly lead them to buy products or services provided by the tagetted advertisers ads.

[jetteroheller]

I do nothing but dynamic sites, it's not an issue.

It's an issue.

Imagine Your site is mentioned in TV and many people want to visit in a short time.

I have proof, that dynamic web sites crash under such a load.

[percentages]

>2. Provide good size of information.
>3. Target the high valu keywords in page title and file name.
>4. Do not use the dynamic website.

A few issues with these points:

2. You want them to click on an Ad? Well why should they if you provide the info on your site?

3. Yes, I agree there is a lot of money in "high profile" keywords, but, there is more in low profile keywords. Play the 80-20 rule, and take the 20 that is easy Vs the 80 that has a lot of competition.

4. What the heck is wrong with dynamic websites? They are absolutely essential to success these days unless you happen to own a cornerstone of the Internet.

[percentages]

>Imagine Your site is mentioned in TV and many people want to visit in a short time.

>I have proof, that dynamic web sites crash under such a load.

That is not an issue with dynamic web sites, it is an issue with your hosting provider. If you need the ability to respond to rapid bursts of activity generated by TV or other advertising then you should have found a suitable host beforehand ;)

[incrediBILL]

Imagine Your site is mentioned in TV and many people want to visit in a short time.

I have proof, that dynamic web sites crash under such a load.

I hate to burst your bubble but even a 100% static site can crater under the load.

If you don't believe me, sticky me your URL and I'll aim a few load/stress testing tools at your box and watch it go down in flames. Obviously my site would go down before a static site, but I can can also set up multiple front-end servers load balanced to hand the situation.

Luckily I'm currently not using ASP or PHP so it'll stay up a lot longer than most.

Just a matter of how much hardware you want to throw at a problem, but it can be done.

[Publisher]

My site is dynamic/static...that is I use a CMS that works from a database, but creates static html pages.