Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Waits while everyone runs to check...
What I want to know is how well the ad unit eCPM compares, like for like, between your Site and Contextual targetted income.
For me I'm seeing that Site targetting is giving less than 10% eCPM compared to Contextual targetting in all cases.
Aircut, you should make sure your reasoning is correct before blocking advertisers willy-nilly.
i am not blocking willy-nilly as you said.
i blocked a bunch of MFA sites, and couple of others that were site targeted.
48 hours has passed and the 30% drop in ecpm i was reporting in other thread which i experienced the entire month of february, resolved to normal healthy earnings.
i know and understand that google makes money from those sick MFA sites, but i am for one wont send my users to these dead-ends, and i am sure that repeated visitors will avoid clicking on google ads if they learn that all they find behind it is a junk mfa site.
sorry for the rant. back to the point. i am considering every site for its value for my users and its value for my earnings before putting it on the limited 200
When I tried it, the preview tool brought up lots of ads that do not appear to be site-targeted. In fact I'm fairly sure they aren't, because I did the test on a lesser-known site that according to Google's reports has never had ANY site-targeted impressions or clicks. The ads appear to be simply targeted to the general theme of that site.
I am expecting 50% drop for the first day income after having my targetting and advertise on this site resumed, impressions and CTR are just normal, it is the drop of EPC.
AS algorthm in most are conservative and always starting from the negative side, it looks like always go with a "reset" effect and then start to recover steadily, let see if it can work out or it will go to my toliet ... :P