Forum Moderators: martinibuster
$30 in my first 3-4 months from a 100 page site, and nearly my 100th post on webmasterworld.com
Magic!
Over the course of the past 2 years, I've noticed that the ads on my site group themselves into three or four distinct subject areas, and I've made some guesses as to which is the most lucrative. But they are only guesses.
Give it some time.
Just remember to keep the click revenue in perspective. You can build a mesothelioma site and get one $50 click a day or you can build a site about pencils and get 100 clicks at $.50. Which is the better site? Whichever site is the easiest and fastest to make :).
Some people prefer to go after the massive amounts of traffic at low cpc since they feel it is less risky. Their revenue is not dependent on just 1 serp. Instead their revenue is generated by thousands of serps. So if they lose some rankings they still have decent revenue.
When looking at your personal site don't compare yourself with overall averages. You should look to compare yourself with data about your industry. For example compare yourself against the bid prices in Google Adwords. If Adwords is charging $2 for "widgets" and you only earn $.05 for your "widgets" page then your page is probably not targeted properly.
That's what Google is making... they just forgot to adjust the pricing that one time. you make pennies and they make money...
lol Why do people always assume Google is running off with all the money and leaving the publishers with a tiny percentage. I have read two different articles, one from NYTimes and one from Barrons and both mention revenue share as being divided roughly 80 publisher 20 google.
Regarding the main post, some niche's are hot, some are cold, and some bounce back and forth between the two. You have to measure the consistency of the price per clicks over a span of time to determine whether you're in a good niche or not.
Is this what really successful people are doing?