Forum Moderators: not2easy
I'm having too much fun today from a satirical point of view and using <span class="blink">Blinking Text Here</span> has added to my satire! ;)
... it was the 90's. They said they'd be happy to answer any web design questions we might have.
;-)
(But surely you meant
<span style="text-decoration:blink">blink</span>
But surely you meant<span style="text-decoration:blink">blink</span>
Nope. I don't use inline styles, too much code bloat. I prefer external style sheets.
.blink{
text-decoration:blink;
}
Nope. I don't use inline styles, too much code bloat. I prefer external style sheets.
P1R, I think you missed zCat's *90's* sarcasm there ;)
But surely you meant <span style="text-decoration:blink">blink</span>Nope. I don't use inline styles, too much code bloat. I prefer external style sheets.
.blink{
text-decoration:blink;
}
Ah, but you didn't include this in the <head> of your original post, which caused me to go into quirks mode ;-).
Why doesn't IE support the Blink Element? They support all the other nifty little features like page transitions, scrollbar colors, etc. but not Blink. Bummer!
Marqueeeeeee
Ah, thanks DrDoc! Do you think that matches the quality effect of the Blink Element?
<marquee class="blink">this should</marquee>
Dude, you are awesome! I didn't even think of that. How do you think users would react to that particular implementation?
