Forum Moderators: not2easy
I tried completely removing the size specification from the CSS, but the "medium" setting is enormous and even the "smallest" setting is probably larger than some users would choose.
In a perfect world, I'd like to "suggest" a size that could be resized by the user. Inserting font tags seems kind of a backward step, though.
Are user-selectable style sheets the only solution to this dilemma? This would involve some significant recoding that I'd prefer to avoid.
I've experimented a bit and found that on this site specifying .8em seems to result in a fairly pleasing "medium" size and allow quite dramatic resizing by the user, but the fact that this is really a percentage specification makes me wonder what kind of weird situations I might run into if I use it. Thoughts?
IE cannot handle ems very well (hence the reports from your users?) unless you specify the root font size as a percentage. If you don't that's where you get this weird variation between huge and tiny on resize.
Suggestion, general practice is that you try something like this if you have a container/wrapper element available:
body {font-size: 100%;}
<container> {font-size: 0.8em;}
or if no wrapper/container element available:
body {font-size: 80%;}
then if are using em's further in your document already, you can just leave them or alternatively just use percentages throughout, instead of em's
both ways should be very easy to implement, with very little change to the CSS
Suzy
With the .8em setting, the resizing effect is quite extreme compared to an HTML font size. The "normal" font looks fine, but the "smallest" font looks rather like small gray lines on the page. And the "largest" is enormous, though possibly useful for the visually impaired.