Forum Moderators: not2easy
Unfortunately you won't be able to try out ie5.5 mac, but for the rest it's a good setup.
windows 98 version 1 - IE 4
windows 2000 default install - IE 5
your development os - ie 6, plus all other browsers you normally test in that are windows based, since they are all stand alone apps as long as you install them into separate folders, not their default ones. Other browsers are all available from evolt.org
If something works in 5 it's probably going to work in 5.5.
Mac IE you're out of luck currently unless you have a mac, though there are online services that will give you screen shots of your page in all major browsers, I'm not a fan of those for many reasons.
If you keep up the testing box, you can add suse or redhat to it, then run the kde desktop, that gives you konqueror 3.2 kurrently. 3.2 is a bit behind current safaris but it's close enough. knoppix also has 3.2 or 3.15, can't remember which.
1. Mac IE 5.5 is the most horrendous browser. Most web design headaches are in mac IE, as valid code tends to look great (well, similar at least) in all the other mac browsers.
2. There are plenty of mac markets that still use IE over Safari, the education market being one of them.
In addition to the pay-for-screenshot services, you can sometimes network with a mac user here at webmasterworld and ask for them to check specific pages/sites. You can figure out who to sticky with your request by looking at who posts in the Mac Webmaster forum [webmasterworld.com]. (I happen to be one of them, btw.)
5.5 for mac? 5.2 is latest!
Everyone I know calls it 5.5 even though it is technically 5.2.3. I think it's because 5.2 was the revision that brought it in line with the win equivalent 5.5. Not sure though... I do know that trying to call it 5.2 or 5. confuses more people than calling it 5.5. :D
<added>
From another thread, you can learn more about Mac IE 5 CSS bugs:
[macedition.com...]
</added>
If something works in 5 it's probably going to work in 5.5.
That is an incorrect assumption. IE5.5 brought with it a wide array of bugs and problems not previously experienced in IE5.0
Everyone I know calls it 5.5 even though it is technically 5.2.3. I think it's because 5.2 was the revision that brought it in line with the win equivalent 5.5.
IE/Mac has always been ahead of the Windows version, not the other way around. The rendering engine in 5.2/Mac is closer to IE/Win 6.0 than 5.5 ;)
It's not an assumption, it's an observation.
The rendering is close enough from my experience. In general, IE 5.5 is my favorite IE browser, I've never installed IE 6 on my main development box, don't like it, almost every piece of css I've written works ok on 5x, no major differences, obviously there are minor ones, like overflow:auto not working right in 5.0, but it doesn't work right in 6.0 either, only 5.5 had that right, but 5.5 had better css support than 5.0, ergo the conclusion that if it works in 5.0, it's probably going to be ok in 5.5, that's been my experience, your's may be different. However, IE 5, 5.5, and 6 each have unique little bugs, as drdoc notes, so you'd better check in all of them no matter what.
This doesn't say that you shouldn't test any commercial css in all, 4, 5, 5.5, 6, that's necessary. A recent commercial project I did is getting a surprisingly high % IE 4, about 3%, versus .12% Opera, so I know where I'm putting my development time. Also, for those counting, 5% Mozilla/Netscape
And remember, IE 5x mac has zero relation to IE 5x Windows, zero. Nothing you do will work, or that's what you should expect, so if you have a mac audience you'd better pick up a used mac for testing. Next year there will probably be a mac virtual machine for linux.