you know sometimes i love google!
One has to log into every account individually to associate the IDs.
If one goes to the analytics page and receives the error 'no analytics programs are associated with this account' to be able to add the account ID right inside the MCC instead of having to log into each account individually.
If there's a different way to link existing accounts without having to do this all individually, I'd appreciate the solution (very possible I missed it dealing with all the new Google account IDs).
So, it is very important to understand the Google account access requirements - and not to think security and automatically say 'no' to everything - but to think about access.
In addition, I do really miss the old days of begin able to do more through the MCC and not thinking about all the various access points to all of these accounts...
Anyway - I've been playing with the goal settings, funnel settings, etc in the Google account - and I must say, this was very well integrated for Google accounts.
Has anyone tried cross channel tracking yet to see if it's possible to pull data from multiple sources (such as a banner ad or other ppc campaign) into this funnel?
Have been at Pubcon all week, so behind on my own research/posting until this weekend
[added]I wasn't allowed to give my own MCC access to the analystics as the error message was: "This account is already a login to another AdWords account. Please select a different Google Account login to access this account. ".
However, when I login through the MCC the analytics tab showps up. Wonder if it'll go away when the invitation that I can't accept from myself expires in a month.
One I have not placed the code on. The thingy that checks the code says I have added it to that site!
One I placed the code on 24 hours ago. Apparently it isn't present, according to the checker
One I placed the code on an hour ago, really to see whether there is a "standard delay"
It seems that demand has outstripped supply! I suspect it's quite warm in the various big G data centres
Signed up a second site Thursday. Google still doesn;t recognize that that the script has been added to that website.
I see they stopped allowing new sites to be added. They probably should have done that much earlier.
I see they stopped allowing new sites to be added. They probably should have done that much earlier.
Google must be the only outfit in the world where "Stealth Marketing" is more successful than any other type.
No announcement, no nothing, just "shh, here it is" and Whoosh! Same for gmail, or, as we Brits must now say "Googlemail" (oops!)
I'm usually in Google's corner, but I think this time we've been suckered.
I have don't seem to have received any stats based on the adwords campaign that Google Analytics is based on?
Since Thursday 17th I have received no stats whatsoever from any sort of results, is anyone else experiencing these sort of problems?
[paraphrase]
email about not allowing new signups due to a backlog of requests.
[/paraphrase]
i have just received the data in my account after 4 days wait. lets hope things are being sorted out!
[edited by: eWhisper at 7:12 pm (utc) on Nov. 21, 2005]
[edit reason] Please don't post emails. See TOS. [/edit]
I tried to validate that the code I entered was correct, but Google couldn't recognize it. Sent an email to support and this was their response:
***
The "Check Status" feature is currently not accurate. If you added the code to your pages correctly, then we are collecting data. You can make sure by seeing if your site has set "_utm" cookies in your browser.
Our engineers are currently working to solve the problem and hope to reach a resolution shortly. This will not affect data collection or report generation if you have already tagged your website with the Google Analytics Tracking Code.
***
I looked again and still nothing. I checked my cookies and they _utm was in fact there. So then I refreshed the analytics page and there it was.
We use Urchin for our traffic reports and I love it. Haven't spend enough time w/these reports to see if they're as good...plus there's not enough data yet.
Rich Brooks
[edited by: encyclo at 5:42 pm (utc) on Nov. 13, 2006]
[edit reason] no URL signatures please, see terms of service [/edit]