The BT Search (Ink) seems to combine some of Excite UK and Hotbot UK results (?). It appears that the latter HB results are fresher than the actual HBUK database where they do match. So, I'd agree with <I'm pretty sure that the Ink results are updated>
It's interesting to see that despite filtering for UK the BT Search results have some (non-UK?).com sites. Being familiar with these particular pages I can't see why they're beating more relevant .com pages in other SERPS on either UK or US databases.
As a user, I'd question the overall relevance of the BT Search. As for SEO, still frustrating!
It just goes to prove that no matter how much money/time & resources you have, you can still produce a bad site, the search facility (IMHO) is burried at the top and will probably hardly get used, isn't it a shame that one of our great UK companies(there's not many) can't produce something that's at least on par with our US friends.
Any one want to put a quote into BT to rebuild
Edited by: tigger
>and will probably hardly get used - 3-4 referals a day on average as opposed to 4-500 on MSN UK across the spread of sites I monitor.
If it's only ink updated, then it's bad for some of the positioning I used to see. I think it's a filter not quite working.
I've not checked for the rankings as I was under the impression that anything not paid for with ink would get burried, although this looks like this may not be the case as some people are showing good results with the index only.